肺磨玻璃结节患者血清炎症因子及髓源性抑制细胞的表达水平及临床意义

郭婧瑶 骆莹滨 吴建春 张博 李雁

郭婧瑶, 骆莹滨, 吴建春, 张博, 李雁. 肺磨玻璃结节患者血清炎症因子及髓源性抑制细胞的表达水平及临床意义[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(13): 693-698. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220275
引用本文: 郭婧瑶, 骆莹滨, 吴建春, 张博, 李雁. 肺磨玻璃结节患者血清炎症因子及髓源性抑制细胞的表达水平及临床意义[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(13): 693-698. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220275
Jingyao Guo, Yingbin Luo, Jianchun Wu, Bo Zhang, Yan Li. Expression levels and clinical significance of serum inflammatory cytokines andmyeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodule[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49(13): 693-698. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220275
Citation: Jingyao Guo, Yingbin Luo, Jianchun Wu, Bo Zhang, Yan Li. Expression levels and clinical significance of serum inflammatory cytokines andmyeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodule[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49(13): 693-698. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220275

肺磨玻璃结节患者血清炎症因子及髓源性抑制细胞的表达水平及临床意义

doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220275
基金项目: 本文受国家自然基金面上项目(编号:81973795)和上海申康三年行动计划项目(编号:SHDC2020CR4052)赞助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭婧瑶:专业方向为中医药防治恶性肿瘤的机制及临床研究

    通讯作者:

    李雁 yan.xiaotian@shutcm.edu.cn

Expression levels and clinical significance of serum inflammatory cytokines andmyeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodule

Funds: This work was supported by the National Natural Foundation of China (No. 81973795) and Three-Year Action Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center (No. SHDC2020CR4052)
More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  探究血清炎症因子及外周血髓源性抑制细胞(myeloid-derived suppressor cells,MDSCs)在直径≤1 cm的肺磨玻璃结节(ground-glass nodule,GGN)患者中的表达,分析可能影响肺结节大小及进展的临床指标和意义。  方法  采用前瞻性研究方法纳入2020年4月至2021年7月就诊于上海中医药大学附属市中医医院肺GGN直径≤1 cm的患者111例,根据肺结节大小分为微小结节组(直径<5 mm)、小结节组(直径为5~10 mm),其中微小结节组36例,小结节组75例。检测各组患者血清炎症因子表达以及外周血髓源性抑制细胞的比例,分析组间差异。后续每半年随访1次,以影像学显示肺GGN直径增大2 mm及以上或出现新的GGN为研究终点,分析可能影响肺GGN进展的危险因素。  结果  小结节组较微小结节组患者MDSCs的比例升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间炎症因子白细胞介素-2(interleukin-2,IL-2)、白细胞介素-6(interleukin-6,IL-6)、白细胞介素-8(interleukin-8,IL-8)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组间肺结节变化率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MDSCs是影响肺GGN进展的危险因素,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),根据MDSCs表达水平的截断值进行分组分析,结果显示MDSCs低水平表达组(MDSCs<4.57%)较高水平表达组(MDSCs≥4.57%)疾病稳定期更长,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.001)。  结论  MDSCs表达水平与肺GGN大小相关,可能是影响肺GGN进展的因素之一。

     

  • 图  1  流式细胞术检测两组间MDSCs百分比

    图  2  MDSCs百分比与结局指标ROC曲线分析

    图  3  不同MDSCs水平患者疾病稳定期的K-M曲线

    表  1  两组患者一般临床资料比较

    项目微小结节组(n=36)小结节组(n=75)χ2/FP
    性别0.405a0.527
     男1129
     女2546
    年龄(岁)54.17±14.4955.40±13.171.628b0.205
    吸烟史0.936a
     有 510
     无3165
    家族史0.929a1.000
     有 612
     无3063
    结节数量0.116a0.137
     孤立性1622
     多发性2053  
    a:χ2值,bF
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  两组间炎症因子及MDSCs表达水平比较

    项目微小结节组(n=36)小结节组(n=75)F/ZP
    IL-2333.89±105.68322.80±100.280.112b0.593
    IL-61.52(1.09)2.08(1.30)−1.603c0.109
    IL-88.30(6.10)7.27(4.76)−0.624c0.533
    TNF-α6.15(3.72)5.88(2.00)−1.841c0.066
    MDSCs(%)2.56(2.50)3.63(5.44)−1.997c0.046
    bF值,cZ
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  两组间肺GGN变化率比较

    结节变化微小结节组(n=36)小结节组(n=75)P
    稳定33(8.33)68(9.33)0.585
    增大/增多 3(91.67) 7(90.67)
    ()内单位为%
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  肺GGN单因素分析

    参数结节稳定结节增大OR95%CIP
    下限上限
    结节大小(mm)1.1320.2754.6610.863
     <533(91.67)3(8.33)
     5~1068(90.67)7(9.33)
    结节数量0.4510.0912.240.331
     孤立性36(89.74)2(5.26)
     多发性65(89.00)8(11.00)
    吸烟史1.6920.3238.8590.533
     否88(91.67)8(8.33)
     是13(86.67)2(13.33)
    家族史0.5490.0654.6230.581
     否84(90.32)9(9.68)
     是17(94.44)1(5.56)
    IL-20.9750.9481.0040.086
    IL-60.8060.4321.5030.497
    IL-80.8770.6721.1430.331
    TNF-α2.0650.6666.4090.209
    MDSCs(%)1.7281.0092.9570.046
    ()内单位为%
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同MDSCs表达水平对肺GGN进展的影响分析

    MDSCs分组疾病稳定期(月)χ2P
    低水平表达组20.565±0.30311.3720.001
    高水平表达组17.075±0.907
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 张晓菊,白莉,金发光,等.肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2018年版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(10):763-771. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.10.004
    [2] Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, et al. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons[J]. Radiology, 2007, 245(1):267-275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682
    [3] 田龙,沈诚,车国卫.肺部磨玻璃密度影研究进展[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2015,22(4):371-374. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.20150098
    [4] Jin CC, Lagoudas GK, Zhao C, et al. Commensal microbiota promote lung cancer development via γδ T cells[J]. Cell, 2019, 176(5):998-1013.
    [5] Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150
    [6] Bergenfelz C, Larsson AM, von Stedingk K, et al. Systemic monocytic-MDSCs are generated from monocytes and correlate with disease progression in breast cancer patients[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5):e0127028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127028
    [7] Yamauchi Y, Safi S, Blattner C, et al. Circulating and tumor myeloid-derived suppressor cells in resectable non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, 198(6):777-787. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1707OC
    [8] 中国物联网辅助评估管理肺结节专家组.物联网辅助评估管理肺结节中国专家共识[J].国际呼吸杂志,2022,42(1):5-12. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131368-20211110-00835
    [9] Mazzone PJ, Lam L. Evaluating the patient with a pulmonary nodule: a review[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(3):264-273. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24287
    [10] Nasim F, Ost DE. Management of the solitary pulmonary nodule[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2019, 25(4):344-353. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000586
    [11] Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377
    [12] Heuvelmans MA, Walter JE, Peters RB, et al. Relationship between nodule count and lung cancer probability in baseline CT lung cancer screening: the NELSON study[J]. Lung Cancer, 2017, 113:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.023
    [13] 钟文英,林秋娥,王黎平,等.健康体检人群肺部结节发生的影响因素分析[J].福建医药杂志,2019,41(2):140-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2600.2019.02.053
    [14] 潘越,江启成.健康体检人群肺结节检出情况及影响因素分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2020,36(3):356-359.
    [15] Li XF, Ren F, Wang SH, et al. The epidemiology of ground glass opacity lung adenocarcinoma: a network-based cumulative meta-analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10:1059. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01059
    [16] Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells[J]. Cancer Immunol Res, 2017, 5(1):3-8. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0297
    [17] Hegde S, Leader AM, Merad M. MDSC: markers, development, states, and unaddressed complexity[J]. Immunity, 2021, 54(5):875-884.
    [18] Zhou J, Nefedova Y, Lei AH, et al. Neutrophils and PMN-MDSC: their biological role and interaction with stromal cells[J]. Semin Immunol, 2018, 35:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.12.004
    [19] Weber R, Groth C, Lasser S, et al. IL-6 as a major regulator of MDSC activity and possible target for cancer immunotherapy[J]. Cell Immunol, 2021, 359:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104254
    [20] Shi J, Liu X, Ming ZJ, et al. Value of combined detection of cytokines and tumor markers in the 
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Chin J Lung Cancer, 2021, 24(6):426-433.
    [21] Liu CY, Xie WG, Wu S, et al. A comparative study on inflammatory factors and immune functions of lung cancer and pulmonary ground-glass attenuation[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2017, 21(18):4098-4103.
  • 加载中
图(3) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  133
  • HTML全文浏览量:  32
  • PDF下载量:  26
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-21
  • 录用日期:  2022-04-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-04-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回