Somashekhar SP, Ramya Y, Rohit Kumar C, Shabber SZ, Vijay A, Amit R, Poonam P, Arun KN, Ashwin KR. CRS对比CRS+IP与CRS+HIPEC治疗上皮性卵巢癌辅助化疗时间及预后的前瞻性观察研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(24): 1268-1272. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220837
引用本文: Somashekhar SP, Ramya Y, Rohit Kumar C, Shabber SZ, Vijay A, Amit R, Poonam P, Arun KN, Ashwin KR. CRS对比CRS+IP与CRS+HIPEC治疗上皮性卵巢癌辅助化疗时间及预后的前瞻性观察研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(24): 1268-1272. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220837
A prospective study of CRS versus CRS+IP versus CRS+HIPEC for adjuvant chemotherapy duration and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49(24): 1268-1272. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220837
Citation: A prospective study of CRS versus CRS+IP versus CRS+HIPEC for adjuvant chemotherapy duration and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49(24): 1268-1272. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220837

CRS对比CRS+IP与CRS+HIPEC治疗上皮性卵巢癌辅助化疗时间及预后的前瞻性观察研究

A prospective study of CRS versus CRS+IP versus CRS+HIPEC for adjuvant chemotherapy duration and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer

  • 摘要:
      目的  完全肿瘤细胞减灭术(cytoreductive surgery,CRS)及术后辅助化疗,是晚期原发性上皮性卵巢癌(epithelial ovarian cancer,EOC)的重要预后因素。然而,EOC患者接受辅助化疗开始时机及其与预后的关系尚不明确,值得深入探讨。
      方法  本研究选取2010年1月至2017年12月在印度班加罗尔马尼帕尔综合癌症中心接受完全细胞减灭术的185例晚期原发性EOC患者,其中部分患者接受腹腔化疗或辅助化疗,部分患者未接受腹腔化疗和辅助化疗。分别记录并分析术后开始进行辅助化疗的时间及其对预后的影响。
      结果  接受单纯CRS、CRS联合经腹腔港的腹腔内化疗(intraperitoneal chemotherapy,IP)或腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy,HIPEC)的患者分别为50例、60例和75例。CRS组术后开始接受辅助化疗的平均时间为32天,CRS+IP组为34天,CRS+HIPEC组为41天。CRS组中,术后化疗间隔时间>42天对无复发生存(relapse-free survival,RFS)期有显著影响(36个月 vs. 17个月:P=0.02);在CRS+IP组中,患者RFS差异无统计学意义(35个月vs. 28个月;P=0.78);CRS+HIPEC组,RFS差异无统计学意义(35个月 vs. 32个月;P=0.17)。如期行辅助化疗患者生存期较延迟化疗更好(88个月 vs. 71个月,P=0.49)。
      结论  化疗时间延迟是单纯接受完全CRS患者RFS的不良预后因素。与非HIPEC组相比,化疗时间延迟对HIPEC组患者并未产生显著影响,其原因可能在于术中单次HIPEC弥补了化疗时间延迟带来的不利影响。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, is an important predictor of survival outcome in patients with advanced primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). However, the relationship between the time of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis has not yet been clearly defined in EOC. Methods: 185 patients with primary advanced EOC underwent optimal CRS with or without intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The interval between the day of surgery and start of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on outcome was analyzed.
      Results  CRS, CRS with intraperitoneal chemotherapy as IP port or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was done in 50, 60 and 75 patients respectively. Overall median interval of starting adjuvant chemotherapy was 32 days in the CRS group, 34 days in CRS+IP group and 41 days in CRS+HIPEC group. Delay in chemotherapy, as more than 42 days interval had a significant impact on RFS in CRS group (36 vs. 17 months; P=0.02). Whereas it had some impact in CRS+IP group (38 vs. 28 months; P=0.78) and no impact on CRS+HIPEC group (35 vs. 32 months; P=0.17). There was trend towards better OS (88 vs. 71 months; P=0.49) when adjuvant chemotherapy was not delayed.
      Conclusions  Delay in starting adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affected RFS in patients undergoing optimal CRS alone. However, when compared to non-HIPEC group, the delay didn’t have an impact in the HIPEC group owing to the fact that a single dose of chemotherapy during surgery in heated environment may compensate for the delay.

     

/

返回文章
返回