晚期胃食管胃结合部腺癌二线治疗方案疗效及安全性的回顾性研究

杨晓帆 张鑫鑫 王千里 吴梦婕 王居峰

杨晓帆, 张鑫鑫, 王千里, 吴梦婕, 王居峰. 晚期胃食管胃结合部腺癌二线治疗方案疗效及安全性的回顾性研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(10): 504-509. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20221432
引用本文: 杨晓帆, 张鑫鑫, 王千里, 吴梦婕, 王居峰. 晚期胃食管胃结合部腺癌二线治疗方案疗效及安全性的回顾性研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(10): 504-509. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20221432
Xiaofan Yang, Xinxin Zhang, Qianli Wang, Mengjie Wu, Jufeng Wang. Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens for advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(10): 504-509. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20221432
Citation: Xiaofan Yang, Xinxin Zhang, Qianli Wang, Mengjie Wu, Jufeng Wang. Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens for advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(10): 504-509. doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20221432

晚期胃食管胃结合部腺癌二线治疗方案疗效及安全性的回顾性研究

doi: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20221432
基金项目: 本文课题受河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(编号:SB201901110)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨晓帆:专业方向为消化道肿瘤的诊治

    通讯作者:

    王居峰 zlyywangjufeng0369@zzu.edu.cn

Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens for advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study

Funds: This work was supported by Medical Science Research Projects in Henan Province (No.SB201901110)
More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨晚期胃/食管胃结合部(gastric/gastroesophageal junction,G/GEJ)腺癌适宜的二线治疗方案。  方法  回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年3月于河南省肿瘤医院以紫杉醇单药和紫杉醇联合抗血管或程序性细胞死亡受体-1(programmed cell death protein 1,PD-1)单抗作为二线治疗的晚期G/GEJ腺癌的临床资料。  结果  收集101例患者,中位随访时间为10.4个月,中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)为9.5个月。紫杉醇单药治疗组(43例)、紫杉类联合抗血管组(22例)和紫杉类联合免疫组(36例)客观缓解率(overall response rate,ORR)分别为9.3%、 27.3% 和30.6%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)分别为60.5%、86.4% 和80.6%,中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)分别为2.7个月、4.3个月和3.9个月,中位OS分别为7.0个月、12.0个月和11.0个月,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。三组不良反应均可控,无新型不良事件发生,联合抗血管组高血压发生率为40.9%(9/22),联合PD-1单抗组免疫相关不良反应发生率为19.4%(7/36),与其他两组相比差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);多因素分析显示美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、腹膜转移是患者OS的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。  结论  紫杉类联合抗血管或PD-1单抗治疗可有效延长患者PFS及OS,临床疗效显著且安全性高,是晚期胃癌二线治疗可选择的方案。

     

  • 图  1  三种治疗方案与PFS关系

    图  2  三种治疗方案与OS关系

    表  1  晚期G/GEJ腺癌的临床特征

    基本特征A组
    n=43)
    B组
    n=22)
    C组
    n=36)
    χ²P
    性别1.5510.519
     女10812
     男331424
    ECOG评分(分)3.6100.165
     0~1322025
     211211
    肝转移0.8720.633
     是16810
     否271426
    腹膜转移0.5990.758
     是1167
     否321629
    肿瘤位置1.8390.164
     G221326
     GEJ21910
    分化程度*0.2231.000
     中-低735
     低
    25
    10
    21
    PD-L1表达(CPS评分)*3.5920.487
     <19611
     1~5378
     >5
    3
    2
    8
    MMR表达*1.6890.675
     MSS/MSI-L16919
     MSI-H
    0
    0
    2
    EBER表达*1.7010.426
     阴性11614
     阳性
    0
    1
    2
      
    MMR:错配修复;MSS:微卫星稳定;MSI-L:微卫星低度不稳定;MSI-H:微卫星高度不稳定;*:部分患者未行此项检查或病例资料残缺
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  三组化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及PFS与OS对比

    组别ABCχ²P
    CR(n01 0
    PR(n4510
    SD(n221318
    PD(n1737
    ORR(%)9.327.330.6 6.3990.037
    DCR(%)60.586.480.6 6.5010.041
    PFS(月)2.74.33.914.1390.001
    OS(月)7.012.011.016.788<0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  晚期G/GEJ腺癌中位OS单因素及多因素分析

    临床特征单因素分析多因素分析
    χ²PHR(95%CI)P
    年龄79.310<0.010
    分化程度3.6760.045
    ECOG评分6.5040.0102.22(1.01~4.88)0.048
    腹膜转移12.998<0.0103.97(1.76~9.94)0.001
    治疗方案16.880<0.0100.004
    A组 vs. B组9.8720.0020.24(0.95~0.62)0.003
    A组 vs. C组10.4780.0010.39(0.19~0.78)0.007
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不良反应发生情况

    不良事件≥3级χ²P
    A组B组C组
    贫血11(25.6)1(4.5)7(19.4)1.1400.581
    白细胞减少10(23.3)1(4.5)9(25.0)0.0431.000
    中性粒细胞减少9(20.9)2(9.1)8(22.2)3.8790.159
    淋巴细胞减少2(4.7)1(4.5)2(5.6)2.9600.224
    肝功能损害01(4.5)01.3250.518
    消化道反应1(2.3)1(4.5)1(2.8)1.8700.360
    高血压03(13.6)017.430<0.001
    免疫相关不良事件002(5.6)10.9500.001
    ( )内单位为%
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
    [2] Ghosn M, Tabchi S, Kourie HR, et al. Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: second line and beyond[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016,22(11):3069-3077.
    [3] Wilke H, Muro K, van Cutsem E, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(11):1224-1235.
    [4] 秦叔逵,李进.阿帕替尼治疗胃癌的临床应用专家共识[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2015,20(9):841-847.
    [5] Peng WR, Zhang FL, Wang ZS, et al. Large scale, multicenter, prospective study of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer: a real-world study from China[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2020, 12:6977-6985. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S249153
    [6] Guo YS, Tang JH, Huang XE, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of apatinib combined with or without chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic chemotherapy-refractory gastric adenocarcinoma: a prospective clinical study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(6):e13908. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013908
    [7] Nie CY, Lv HF, Liu YJ, et al. Clinical study of sintilimab as second-line or above therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11:741865.
    [8] Song Y, Li N, Li Q, et al. HX008, an anti-PD1 antibody, plus irinotecan as second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2020, 8(2):e001279. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001279
    [9] Thallinger CMR, Raderer M, Hejna M. Esophageal cancer: a critical evaluation of systemic second-line therapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(35):4709-4714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7599
    [10] Ford HER, Marshall A, Bridgewater JA, et al. Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70549-7
    [11] Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(35):4438-4444. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805
    [12] Shitara K, Takashima A, Fujitani K, et al. Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer(ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 2(4):277-287.
    [13] 杨牡丹,高峻,刘晓玲,等.甲磺酸阿帕替尼联合多西他赛二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2020,42(7):594-597. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190121-00027
    [14] Zhang Y, Xu JY, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of second-line therapy with apatinib combined with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a single-arm, open-label, prospective, multicenter study[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(11):641.
    [15] Shitara K, Özgüroğlu M, Bang YJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10142):123-133. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31257-1
    [16] Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(5):e180013.
    [17] Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2020, 6(10):1571-1580.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  192
  • HTML全文浏览量:  20
  • PDF下载量:  31
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-11
  • 录用日期:  2023-01-18
  • 修回日期:  2022-12-13

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回