岳静, 许芳, 文菁菁, 周巧林, 张亚. 普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭的稳态动员策略在淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(20): 1046-1052. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230827
引用本文: 岳静, 许芳, 文菁菁, 周巧林, 张亚. 普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭的稳态动员策略在淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(20): 1046-1052. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230827
Jing Yue, Fang Xu, Jingjing Wen, Qiaolin Zhou, Ya Zhang. Application of steady-state mobilization regimen of plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim for autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(20): 1046-1052. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230827
Citation: Jing Yue, Fang Xu, Jingjing Wen, Qiaolin Zhou, Ya Zhang. Application of steady-state mobilization regimen of plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim for autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(20): 1046-1052. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230827

普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭的稳态动员策略在淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的应用

Application of steady-state mobilization regimen of plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim for autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭的稳态动员策略在淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤(multiple myeloma,MM)患者中自体外周血造血干细胞(peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell,PBSC)动员的有效性。
      方法  回顾性分析2016年4月至2023年4月于绵阳市中心医院接受普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭(P+Mecapeg),普乐沙福联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(P+rhG-CSF),单用硫培非格司亭(Mecapeg)稳态动员方案进行自体PBSC动员的50例淋巴瘤和MM患者。分别比较3组稳态动员方案的采集疗效、移植后造血重建,并探讨了每组接受稳态动员方案患者采集失败的危险因素。
      结果  50例患者中,应用P+Mecapeg为25例(50.0%),P+rhG-CSF为12例(24.0%),单用Mecapeg为13例(26.0%)。PBSC动员成功率分别为100%、83.3%和76.9%;中位CD34+细胞数分别为4.23×106/kg、3.43×106/kg和3.16×106/kg;中位采集天数分别为1.0、1.5、2.0天。P+Mecapeg组采集第1天单个核细胞显著高于P+rhG-CSF(P=0.030)及单用Mecapeg组(P=0.005),PBSC采集成功率高于单用Mecapeg动员方案(P=0.034),P+Mecapeg动员方案采集成功率较高(P=0.025)。二元Logistic回归分析显示一线自体造血干细胞移植(autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,ASCT)是PBSC采集的独立保护因素(P=0.008,OR=36,95%CI:2.585~501.268)。50例患者中36例完成ASCT,其中P+Mecapeg动员组19例,对照组(P+rhG-CSF及单用Mecapeg动员组)17例,P+Mecapeg与对照组中性粒细胞中位植活时间均为10天,血小板中位植活时间均为12天,两者在造血重建方面比较差异无统计学意义。
      结论  普乐沙福联合硫培非格司亭是一种高效、安全、可替代的PBSC稳态动员策略,能有效提高淋巴瘤和MM患者PBSC动员达标成功率,一线ASCT前进行PBSC动员与采集可显著提高淋巴瘤和MM患者采集成功率。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the efficacy of the steady-state mobilization regimen of plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim for autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM).
      Method  This retrospective study analyzed the data of 50 patients with lymphoma and MM admitted for autologous PBSC mobilization to Mianyang Central Hospital from April 2016 to April 2023. Mobilization was performed using one of the following steady-state mobilization protocols: plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim (P+Mecapeg), plerixafor combined with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (P+rhG-CSF), and mecapegfilgrastim alone (Mecapeg). This study involves the comparison of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and hematopoiesis reconstruction after transplantation within three distinct steady-state mobilization groups. Additionally, it seeks to identify risk factors associated with collection failure.
      Results  Among the 50 cases, 25 (50.0%) received P+Mecapeg, 12 (24.0%) received P+rhG-CSF, and 13 (26.0%) received Mecapeg treatment. The success rate of mobilization in the P+Mecapeg, P+rhG-CSF, and Mecapeg alone groups were 100%, 83.3%, and 76.9%, respectively. The median counts of CD34+ cells collected among the three groups were 4.23×106/kg, 3.43×106/kg, and 3.16×106/kg, respectively, while the median time of collections were 1, 1.5, and 2 days, respectively. Mononuclear cell count on the day of the first apheresis in the P+Mecapeg group was higher than in the P+rhG-CSF (P=0.030) and Mecapeg alone (P=0.005) groups. The success rate of PBSC collection in the P+Mecapeg group was higher than in the Mecapeg alone group (P=0.034), and the P+Mecapeg regimen had a higher success rate of mobilization (P=0.025). Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that first-line autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was an independent protective factor for PBSC collection success (P=0.008, OR=36, 95%CI: 2.585–501.268). Among the above patients, 36 cases completed ASCT, including 19 cases in the P+Mecapeg group and 17 cases in the control groups (P+rhG-CSF and Mecapeg alone). In both P+Mecapeg and control groups, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days, and the platelet engraftment was achieved in a median of 12 days. No statistically significant difference in hematopoietic reconstruction between the two groups was observed.
      Conclusions  Plerixafor plus mecapegfilgrastim is an effective and safe alternative PBSC steady-state mobilization strategy that can effectively improve the success rate of PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoma and MM. PBSC mobilization and collection at first-line ASCT can significantly increase the success rate of PBSC collection in patients with lymphoma and MM.

     

/

返回文章
返回