杨锡贵, 贾丽雅, 魏 玲, 姜 超. 川芎嗪联合环孢霉素A 逆转恶性淋巴瘤多药耐药的研究*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(17): 978-983. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.17.005
引用本文: 杨锡贵, 贾丽雅, 魏 玲, 姜 超. 川芎嗪联合环孢霉素A 逆转恶性淋巴瘤多药耐药的研究*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(17): 978-983. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.17.005
YANG Xigui, JIA Liya, WEI Ling, JIANG Chao. Study on Reversal of Multidrug Resistance in Malignant Lymphoma by Combining Tetramethylpyrazine with Cyclosporine A[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(17): 978-983. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.17.005
Citation: YANG Xigui, JIA Liya, WEI Ling, JIANG Chao. Study on Reversal of Multidrug Resistance in Malignant Lymphoma by Combining Tetramethylpyrazine with Cyclosporine A[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(17): 978-983. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.17.005

川芎嗪联合环孢霉素A 逆转恶性淋巴瘤多药耐药的研究*

Study on Reversal of Multidrug Resistance in Malignant Lymphoma by Combining Tetramethylpyrazine with Cyclosporine A

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨川芎嗪、环孢霉素A 逆转恶性淋巴瘤(ML)多药耐药的机制和临床疗效。方法:120 例经病理组织学证实的复发、耐药的ML患者随机分入A 组(川芎嗪+ 环孢霉素A+化疗)、B 组(环孢霉素A+化疗)、C 组(川芎嗪+ 化疗)、D 组(化疗)。 流式细胞仪分析P-gp的表达,根据P-gp的表达情况进行亚组分析。结果:108 例患者有完整数据可供评估,A 组较D 组有无进展生存期(PFS)优势,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0346),而其他组之间的差异均无统计学意义(P 均>0.05)。 在ORR率方面,逆转剂组(A、B、C 组)较对照组(D 组)均有显著优势,差异有统计学意义(P 均<0.05)。 亚组分析:P-gp(+)76例,在PFS 方面,A、C 组较D 组有优势,差异有统计学意义(P 均<0.05);B 组较D 组有一定的优势,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.0958);A 组较B、C 组有一定的优势,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 在ORR率方面,逆转剂组(A、B、C 组)较对照组(D 组)均有显著优势,差异均有统计学意义(P 均<0.05);A 组较B、C 组有优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 P-gp(-)32例患者,在PFS ,ORR方面,各组间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。 川芎嗪、环孢霉素A 未增加明显的不良反应。结论:川芎嗪、环孢霉素A 可在一定程度上逆转ML的多药耐药,与P-gp的表达密切相关,两者联合用药疗效更佳。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the mechanism and reversing effect of tetramethylpyrazine (TMPZ) and cyclosporine A (CsA) on multidrug resistance (MDR) in treating malignant lymphoma (ML). Methods:A total of120 ML patients with pathologically confirmed relapse and drug resistance were randomly divided into four groups: (A) TMPZ + CsA + chemo-therapy, (B) CsA + chemotherapy, (C) TMPZ + chemotherapy and (D) chemotherapy alone. Flow cytometry was used to an -alyze the P-gp expression, and sub-group analysis was conducted based on the P-gp expression.Results: Complete data for 108 of the 120 patients were available for evaluation. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients was higher in group (A) than in group (D) (P=0.0346). There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison between the other two groups (P>0.05). There was a higher overall response rate (ORR) in the reversal-agent groups (A, B and C) than in the control group (D) (P<0.05). The subgroup analysis has shown that P-gp (+) was seen in 76patients. The PFS of the patients with P-gp (+) was higher in group (A) and (C) than in group (D), with statistical differences among the groups (P<0.05). The PFS of patients with P-gp (+) was higher in group (B) than in group (D), nevertheless, there were no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The ORR was higher in the patients with P-gp (+ ) in the reversal agent groups (A, B and C) than those in the control group (D), with statistical differences among the groups ( P<0.05). There was a manifest advantage in the ORR in group (A) compared with that in groups (B) and (C), (P<0.05). P-gp (-) was seen in 32 patients. Concerning PFS and ORR of the patients, there were no statistically significant differences in comparison among the groups ( P>0.05). No obvious adverse side effects were seen with TMPZ and CsA treatments. Conclusion:TMPZ and CsA can, to a certain degree, reverse MDR in relapsed or refractory ML and is closely correlated with the P-gp expression. There is an improved curative effect in the combined therapy of the two drugs.

     

/

返回文章
返回