杨越波, 张 宇, 叶敏娟, 丁 淼①, 张永裕②, 李小毛. 子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴结转移的高危因素分析*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(21): 1224-1226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.21.006
引用本文: 杨越波, 张 宇, 叶敏娟, 丁 淼①, 张永裕②, 李小毛. 子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴结转移的高危因素分析*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(21): 1224-1226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.21.006
YANG Yuebo1, ZHANG Yu1, YE Minjuan1, DING Miao2, ZHANG Yongyu3, LI Xiaomao1. Analysis of High-Risk Factors of Pelvic Nodal Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(21): 1224-1226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.21.006
Citation: YANG Yuebo1, ZHANG Yu1, YE Minjuan1, DING Miao2, ZHANG Yongyu3, LI Xiaomao1. Analysis of High-Risk Factors of Pelvic Nodal Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(21): 1224-1226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.21.006

子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴结转移的高危因素分析*

Analysis of High-Risk Factors of Pelvic Nodal Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的:回顾性分析子宫内膜癌患者淋巴结转移的情况,探讨子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴结转移的高危因素。方法:对2000年12月~2004年12月中山大学附属第三医院、中山大学附属第二医院及中山大学附属肿瘤医院妇科收治的189 例子宫内膜癌病例进行回顾性分析,探讨年龄、病理类型、组织学分级、肌层浸润深度、附件转移等与淋巴结转移的关系。结果:术后病理类型中子宫内膜样腺癌、腺鳞癌、非子宫内膜样腺癌的淋巴结转移率分别是13.1% 、44.4% 、8.3% ,各病理类型间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组织学分级G1、G2、G3 的淋巴结转移发生率分别是2.3% 、14.2% 、31.3% ,各分级间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);肌层浸润深度中无肌层浸润、浅肌层浸润、深肌层浸润的淋巴结转移率分别为0、8.0% 、35.4% ,三者比较有显著性差异(P<0.01);有附件转移者与无附件转移者淋巴结转移率为51.5% 、6.4% ,两者比较有显著性差异(P<0.001)。 对单因素分析有意义的变量用Lo?gistic回归分析进行多因素分析,结果只有各肌层浸润深度及附件转移与否引起淋巴结转移的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。 结论:腺鳞癌、组织学低分化、深肌层浸润、附件转移者淋巴结转移率较高,肌层浸润深度及附件转移与否是影响盆腔淋巴结转移的独立高危因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the high-risk factors of pelvic nodal metastasis in endometrial carcinoma and to an -alyze the pelvic nodal metastasis in the carcinoma. Methods:Data of189 patients with endometrial carcinoma admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Tumor Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University, during a period from December 2000to December 2004, were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation of the pelvic lymph-node metasta -sis with age, pathological types, histological grading, muscular invasion depth and adnexal metastasis were studied. Results: The rates of pelvic nodal metastasis were 13.1%,44.4% and 8.3%, respectively, in the cases with endometrial adeno-carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and there were significant differences in the metastatic rates among the three postoperative pathologic types ( P<0.05). The rates of pelvic nodal metastasis were 2.3%,14.2% and 31.3%, respectively, in the metastases with histological grade 1, 2 and 3, with significant differences in the nodal metastases among the three histological grades ( P<0.01). The rates of pelvic nodal metastasis were 0%,8.0% and 35.4%, respectively, in the cases without muscular infiltration, with superficial invasion of the muscular layer and with deep infiltration of muscular layer. There were statistically significant differences among the three metastatic rates ( P<0.01). The rates of pelvic lymphatic metastasis were 51.5% and 6.4% in the cases with and without adnexal metastasis, respec -tively, with significant differences between the two (P<0.001 ). Logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis of the variances which are meaningful to the univariate analysis. The results have shown that there is statistical signifi-cance in the differences of the depth of muscular infiltration and with or without adnexal metastasis (P< 0.01). Conclusion: The high-risk factors of pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma include adenosquamous carcinoma, poor histological differentiation, deep infiltration of the muscular layer and adnexal metastasis. The independent high-risk factors affecting the pelvic nodal metastasis are the depth of muscular invasion and the presence or absence of the adnexal me-tastasis.

     

/

返回文章
返回