孙元珏, 张剑军, 汤丽娜, 郑水儿, 王智昱, 赵 晖, 林 峰, 沈 赞, 姚 阳. 137 例MAID方案一线化疗转移软组织肉瘤的回顾性临床分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(24): 1411-1414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.009
引用本文: 孙元珏, 张剑军, 汤丽娜, 郑水儿, 王智昱, 赵 晖, 林 峰, 沈 赞, 姚 阳. 137 例MAID方案一线化疗转移软组织肉瘤的回顾性临床分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(24): 1411-1414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.009
SUN Yuanjue, ZHANG Jianjun, TANG Lina, ZHENG Shuier, WANG Zhiyu, ZHAO Hui, LIN Feng, SHEN Zan, YAO Yang. Retrospective Clinical Analysis of MAID Regimen as First-line Treatment for 137 Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(24): 1411-1414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.009
Citation: SUN Yuanjue, ZHANG Jianjun, TANG Lina, ZHENG Shuier, WANG Zhiyu, ZHAO Hui, LIN Feng, SHEN Zan, YAO Yang. Retrospective Clinical Analysis of MAID Regimen as First-line Treatment for 137 Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(24): 1411-1414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.009

137 例MAID方案一线化疗转移软组织肉瘤的回顾性临床分析

Retrospective Clinical Analysis of MAID Regimen as First-line Treatment for 137 Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients

  • 摘要: 目的:评价MAID方案一线治疗转移性STS 的临床疗效、不良反应和对生存期的影响。方法:根治术后出现远处转移的晚期STS 患者137 例,阿霉素(ADM)60mg/m2第1 天静脉滴注,异环磷酰胺(IFO )8~10g/m2分4~5 天静脉滴注,IFO 开始静脉滴注的0、4、8h 各予美司纳(Mesna)每天总量的20% 静脉推注,氮烯咪胺(DTIC)200mg/m2静脉滴注,连续4~5 天。21天为1 个周期,完成2~6 个周期,中位周期数为4 个。结果:全组患者CR4 例(2.9%),PR13例(9.5%),SD88例(64.2%),PD32例(23.4%),有效率12.4% ,临床获益率76.6% 。PFS 2~14个月,mPFS(5.00± 1.12)个月,OS3~19个月,mOS(8.00± 1.32)个月。3 个月PFS 生存率56.9% ,6 个月PFS 生存率27.2% ,1 年PFS 生存率7.8% 。3 个月OS生存率100.0% ,6 个月OS生存率41.5% ,1 年OS生存率10.7% 。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应和脱发,其他不良反应少见。结论:MAID方案一线治疗转移性STS 疗效确切,能够有效控制疾病进展,不良反应可以耐受,作为进展期STS 的一线化疗方案具有明显的临床应用价值。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy, adverse reactions and survival of 137 metastatic soft tissue sarcoma pa -tients treated with MAID regimen as first-line therapy. Methods:One hundred and thirty-seven patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were treated with MAID regimen chemotherapy with ifosfamide at a total dose of 8~10g/m2 in 4-5 days,adriamycin at a dose of 60mg/m2 on the first day and dacarbazine at a dose of200 mg/m2/d in 4-5 days. Twenty one days were regarded as a cycle and2-6 cycles were completed. The median cycle number was 4. Results: Four cases had com-plete remission (CR) (2.9% ), 13cases achieved partial remission (PR) ( 9.5% ), 88cases maintained stable disease (SD) (64.2%), and32cases had progressive disease (PD) ( 23.4%). The overall response rate (RR) was 12.4% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 76.6%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 2-14months and the median PFS was5.00± 1.12 months. The overall survival (OS) was 3-19months and the median OS was8.00± 1.32months. The 3 month PFS rate was 56.9%, the 6 month PFS rate was27.2% and the one year PFS rate was7.8%. The3 month OS rate was 100 .0%, the 6 month OS rate was 41.5% and the one year OS rate was 10.7%. The main adverse reactions were bone marrow suppres-sion, nausea/vomiting and alopecia. Other adverse reactions were rarely observed. Conclusion:MAID treatment controls disease progression effectively and the side effects can be tolerated. MAID treatment can be used as one of the first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回