宋红林, 黄清华①, 李 力. 新辅助化疗在宫颈癌治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(24): 1471-1475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.025
引用本文: 宋红林, 黄清华①, 李 力. 新辅助化疗在宫颈癌治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 37(24): 1471-1475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.025
SONG Honglin, HUANG Qinghua, LI Li. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Cervical Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(24): 1471-1475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.025
Citation: SONG Honglin, HUANG Qinghua, LI Li. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Cervical Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37(24): 1471-1475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2010.24.025

新辅助化疗在宫颈癌治疗中的疗效分析

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Cervical Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨新辅助化疗在宫颈癌临床治疗中的作用。方法:以170 例宫颈癌病例(Ⅰb~Ⅳ期)为新辅助化疗试验组,同期同条件未经新辅助化疗的160 例病例为对照组进行回顾性分析。按其治疗方法将研究病例分为6 组,两两配对:NS组(新辅助化疗+ 手术)与S 组(单纯手术);NSR 组(新辅助化疗+ 手术+ 放疗)与SR组(单纯手术+ 放疗);NR组(新辅助化疗+ 放疗)与R 组(单纯放疗);进行配对组间比较。结果:新辅助化疗的总有效率为70% 。NS组的1、3 及5 年生存率分别为87% 、81% 和81% ;对照S 组的为97% 、93% 和93%(P 均>0.05);两组生存曲线无显著性差异(P=0.685)。 NSR 组的1、3 及5 年生存率分别为100% 、93% 和93% ;对照SR组的为100% 、100% 和92%(P 均>0.05);两组生存曲线无显著性差异(P=0.351)。 NR组的1、3 及5 年生存率分别为76% 、45% 和36% ;对照R 组的为81% 、54% 和37%(P 均>0.05);两组生存曲线无显著性差异(P=0.723)。 各组新辅助化疗的不良反应以胃肠道反应为主,患者均可耐受。结论:在宫颈癌治疗中,新辅助化疗虽然不能显著提高宫颈癌患者的生存率,但仍是一种安全的、有较好近期疗效的治疗方法。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer. Methods: From 1985 to 2006, 330 patients with stage Ib-IV cervical cancers were managed into six groups (three pairs). Pair one: NS (NACT followed by surgery) compared with S (Surgery alone); Pair two: NSR (NACT followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy) compared with SR (Surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy); Pair three: NR (NACT followed by radical ra -diotherapy) compared to R (Radical radiotherapy alone). Results: Overall effective rate of NACT was70%. Pair one: The pa-tient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87% ,81% , and81% (NS) versus 97% ,93% and 93% (S), respectively ( P > 0.05). Pair two: The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100 %,93%, and93% (NSR) versus100 %,100 % and 92% (SR), respectively (P > 0.05). Pair three: The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 76%,45%, and36% (NR) versus 81% ,54% and 34% (R), respectively (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in survival curves among these three pairs. The most common adverse reactions were gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusion:NACT is effective for cervical cancer but with no benefit for overall survival.

     

/

返回文章
返回