董立新①, 董淑芬②, 李文军②, 付占昭①, 顾 涛①, 李 平①, 张庆怀①, 杨 森①. 不同病理亚型乳腺癌脑转移患者预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(12): 734-737. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.12.012
引用本文: 董立新①, 董淑芬②, 李文军②, 付占昭①, 顾 涛①, 李 平①, 张庆怀①, 杨 森①. 不同病理亚型乳腺癌脑转移患者预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(12): 734-737. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.12.012
Lixin DONG1, Shufen DONG2, Wenjun LI2, Zhanzhao FU1, Tao GU1, Ping LI1, Qinghuai ZHANG1, Sen YANG1. Breast Cancer Biological Subtypes and Prognosis in Patients with Brain Metastases[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(12): 734-737. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.12.012
Citation: Lixin DONG1, Shufen DONG2, Wenjun LI2, Zhanzhao FU1, Tao GU1, Ping LI1, Qinghuai ZHANG1, Sen YANG1. Breast Cancer Biological Subtypes and Prognosis in Patients with Brain Metastases[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(12): 734-737. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.12.012

不同病理亚型乳腺癌脑转移患者预后分析

Breast Cancer Biological Subtypes and Prognosis in Patients with Brain Metastases

  • 摘要: 目的:了解不同病理亚型乳腺癌脑转移患者的预后特点。方法:根据肿瘤组织免疫组化ER、PR、HER-2 的表达情况将89例患者分为4 组:Luminal A型(ER+ 和/或PR+ ,HER-2-)17例、Luminal B型(ER+ 和/或PR+ ,HER-2 +)15例、HER-2 + 型(ER- ,PR- ,HER-2 +)24例和Basal-like型(ER- ,PR- ,HER-2-)33例。主要观察4 组患者分布比例、发病年龄、月经状态、病理类型、病理分级、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态及脑转移发生距手术时间及部位等。使用SPSS15.0 统计软件进行数据分析,定量资料采用t检验,计数资料比较采用卡方检验,生存率计算采用Kaplan-Meier 法并用Log-rank 检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:所有患者当中Basal-like型所占比例最高(37.1%),其次为HER-2 +(27%),Luminal A型(19.1%),Luminal B型最少(16.9%)。 Basal-like 型患者预后最差,其病理分级Ⅲ级的患者比例达到了73% 。在其他部位出现转移情况上,Luminal型患者表现出较高的骨转移倾向。全组患者的中位生存期为47个月,无病生存期为20个月,确诊脑转移后的生存期为9 个月。ER(-)且PR(-)较ER/PR(+)(45个月vs.52个月,P=0.006)、HER-2(+)较HER-2(-)(45个月vs.51.5 个月,P=0.04)、Basal-like亚型的患者预后较其他亚型差(33个月vs.52个月,P=0.000)。 结论:病理亚型是判断乳腺癌脑转移患者预后不同的良好指标,ER(-)且PR(-)、HER-2(+)、Basal-like亚型患者容易出现脑转移且预后较差。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To analyze the different prognoses of the histological subtypes of breast cancer in patients with brain me -tastases. Methods:A total of 89breast cancer patients with brain metastasis were divided into four biological subgroups: the luminal A group ( ER+ and/or PR+, HER-2- ), 17cases; the luminal B group ( ER+ and/or PR+, HER- 2 + ), 15cases; the HER- 2 + group ( EP-,PR-, HER-2 + ), 24cases; and the basal-like group (EP-, PR-, HER-2- ), 33cases. The distribution of the major proportion, age of onset, menstrual status, pathological type, tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node status, and time between operation and brain metastasis were observed. A t-test was used to analyze the data statistically, as well as with an ANOVA. The Kaplan –Meier method and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare the survival rate through SPSS 15.0. Results: The distribution of patients with basal-like, HER-2 +, luminal A, and luminal B breast cancer with brain metastases was as follows: 37.1%,27%,19.1%, and 16.9%, respectively. Differences in pathological grade were observed, especially in the basal-like group; the percentage of patients in the pathological grade III level was 73% . The basal-like group patients had the worst prognosis. Metastasis was analyzed, which indicated that the lumi-nal-type group patients have higher risk for bone metastasis. In all patients, the median survival time was 47months, the median dis-ease-free survival was20months, and the median survival from brain metastasis was9 months. We found that ER- and PR-, HER2-, and basal-like were each significantly associated with poor survival after diagnosis of brain metastasis. Median survival in the ER- and PR- and ER/PR+ groups were 45and 52months, respectively ( P = 0.006 ). HER-2 + patients, compared with HER-2- patients, had a poor prognosis, (median survival: 45months vs.51.5 months;P = 0.047 ). The patients with the basal-like subtype had the worst prog -nosis of any subtype (median survival time: 33months vs.52months) ( P = 0.000 ). Conclusion:Biological subtype is a useful prog-nostic marker for predicting survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with brain metastases have poor prognosis when they are of the ER- and PR-, HER- 2+, and basal-like subtypes.

     

/

返回文章
返回