汪 洋, 盛晓芳, 董 伟, 高 伟, 倪春霞, 戴嘉中, 孙 磊, 潘 力. 19例复发性高分级胶质瘤再程放疗的经验[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(20): 1271-1274. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.20.009
引用本文: 汪 洋, 盛晓芳, 董 伟, 高 伟, 倪春霞, 戴嘉中, 孙 磊, 潘 力. 19例复发性高分级胶质瘤再程放疗的经验[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(20): 1271-1274. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.20.009
Yang WANG, Xiaofang SHENG, Wei DONG, Wei GAO, Chunxia NI, Jiazhong DAI, Lei SUN, Li PAN. Re-irradiation of 19 Cases of Recurrent High- grade Gliomas[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(20): 1271-1274. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.20.009
Citation: Yang WANG, Xiaofang SHENG, Wei DONG, Wei GAO, Chunxia NI, Jiazhong DAI, Lei SUN, Li PAN. Re-irradiation of 19 Cases of Recurrent High- grade Gliomas[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(20): 1271-1274. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.20.009

19例复发性高分级胶质瘤再程放疗的经验

Re-irradiation of 19 Cases of Recurrent High- grade Gliomas

  • 摘要: 回顾性分析采用IMRT技术再程放射治疗加或不加化学治疗后,复发性高分级胶质瘤(HGG)患者的不良反应、近期疗效和生存率。方法:2007年1月~2009年12月19例复发性HGG患者接受再程常规分割放射治疗,两次放射治疗间隔时间为9~156个月,中位32个月;剂量为40~60Gy,17~30fx,28~45d,中位剂量48Gy,24fx,35d;放射治疗采用IMRT技术;按L-Q模式计算等效生物剂量;记录放射治疗不良反应和近期疗效,计算总体生存率、无局部复发生存率和无放射坏死生存率。结果:本组BEDα/β=10中位值58Gy(48~72Gy)。急性反应主要是消化道反应、头痛和神经功能障碍加重,为1~2级,经对症治疗能明显减轻,未发现3级以上急性反应;有5例发生后期放射性脑坏死;PR 3例,SD 13例,PD 3例;KPS提高5例,不变10例,下降4例。 1、2年总体生存率为62.4%和34.0%;间变性星型细胞瘤和胶质母细胞瘤的中位生存时间分别为11个月和10个月;1、2年无局部复发生存率为45.6%和26.1%;1、2年无放射坏死生存率为68.8%和55.0%。结论:初步结果显示采用IMRT技术和合适的放射剂量(中位BEDα/β=10 58 Gy)再程放射治疗加或不加化学治疗治疗复发性HGG安全有效。但本组病例数较少,值得进一步探索。

     

    Abstract: To retrospectively analyze the toxicity, short-term effects, and survival rate of patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas after re-irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT ) with or without chemotherapy. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2009, 19 patients with recurrent gliomas were re-irradiated with conventional fractionated IMRT. The interval between radiation courses was 9-156 months ( median: 32 months ). The radiation dose was 40–60 Gy, 17–30 fx, 28–45 d ( median: 48 Gy, 24 fx, 35 d ). The biologically effective dose was calculated using the linear quadratic model. Radiation toxicity and short-term efficacy were recorded. The overall survival rate, relapse-free survival rate, and radiation necrosis–free survival rate was calculated. Results: The median biological equivalent dose was 58 Gy ( 48-72 Gy ) in this group. Grades I and II of acute digestive tract side effects, headache and aggravation of neurologic dysfunction, were observed, which were relieved with symptomatic treatment. Toxicity of more than grade III was not found. Five cases with radiation necrosis were found. Among the 19 cases, 3 cases had partial remission, 13 cases had stable disease, and 3 cases had progressive disease. Up to 5 cases had increased Karnovsky performance status, 4 cases had declined Karnovsky performance status, and 10 cases hat no change. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 62.4% and 34.0%. The median survival time of the anaplastic gliomas and glioblastomas were 11 and 10 months, respectively. The 1- and 2-year relapsed-free survival rates were 45.6% and 26.1%. The 1- and 2-year radiation necrosis-free rates were 68.8% and 55.0%. Conclusion: The preliminary results demonstrate that re-irradiation with IMRT and modest dose (median BEDα/β = 10 = 58 Gy ) with or without chemotherapy for recurrent HGG appear to be effective and safe. With the limited number of patients in this group, re-irradiation could be used for treating recurrent gliomas with caution, which deserves further study.

     

/

返回文章
返回