甄婵军, 周志国, 乔学英, 宋玉芝, 李曼. 第7版食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移分期方式的探讨及152例病例分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(23): 1458-1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.23.011
引用本文: 甄婵军, 周志国, 乔学英, 宋玉芝, 李曼. 第7版食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移分期方式的探讨及152例病例分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(23): 1458-1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.23.011
Chanjun ZHEN, Zhiguo ZHOU, Xueying QIAO, Yuzhi SONG, Man LI. Retrospective Study on Staging of Esophageal Cancer with Supra-clavicular Lymph Node Metastasis: An Analysis of 150 Cases[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(23): 1458-1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.23.011
Citation: Chanjun ZHEN, Zhiguo ZHOU, Xueying QIAO, Yuzhi SONG, Man LI. Retrospective Study on Staging of Esophageal Cancer with Supra-clavicular Lymph Node Metastasis: An Analysis of 150 Cases[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38(23): 1458-1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.23.011

第7版食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移分期方式的探讨及152例病例分析

Retrospective Study on Staging of Esophageal Cancer with Supra-clavicular Lymph Node Metastasis: An Analysis of 150 Cases

  • 摘要: 分析食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移放疗疗效及探讨第7版国际食管癌M分期方式。方法:回顾分析2005年1月至2009年12月经病理证实的锁骨上淋巴结转移的胸段食管癌病例152例,其中食管原发灶放射治疗患者95例,手术治疗57例;食管原发灶治疗后锁骨上淋巴结转移的患者81例,首诊时发现71例;141例患者锁骨上淋巴结行放射治疗,11例未行放射治疗。结果:全组患者中位随访时间为17(2~68)个月。放射治疗后近期疗效评价52.5%的患者达CR(74/141)、41.8%达PR(59/141)、3.6%达NC(5/141)、2.1%达PD(3/141)。至随访截止日期生存者40例,1、2、3年生存率分别为69.1%、37.4%、24.0%。多因素分析显示年龄、锁骨上淋巴结转移时间、单侧或双侧转移、近期疗效及是否合并内脏转移对预后的影响有统计学意义(P<0.05)。根据第7版国际食管癌TNM分期按食管原发灶首诊时有无胸腔内及锁骨上区淋巴结转移分为N分期(39例)和M分期(71例)组,两组患者1、2、3年总生存率分别为82.1%、54.1%、31.0%和56.3%、28.1%、21.7%(P=0.041)。按照第6版国际食管癌TNM分期,根据患者食管原发灶首诊时有锁骨上区淋巴结转移的M分期组71例分为M1a 20例与M1b 51例,两组患者1、2、3年总生存率分别为60.0%、27.3%、27.3%和54.9%、28.7%、19.0%,(P=0.930)。单纯锁骨上淋巴结转移(104例)与合并内脏转移(48例)患者的1、2、3年生存率分别为72.1%、47.0%、32.9%和62.5%、17.5%、5.8%(P<0.001)。结论:胸段食管癌出现锁骨上淋巴结转移与胸腔内淋巴结转移患者生存情况存在显著性差异;单纯锁骨上淋巴结转移与合并内脏器官转移患者的预后有显著性差异,分期时是否应将锁骨上淋巴结转移划分为M分期或N分期,还是分亚组需进一步研究;原发灶的位置对食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移的预后影响不大;患者的年龄、锁骨上淋巴结转移时间、单侧或双侧转移、近期疗效及是否合并内脏转移对预后有影响。

     

    Abstract:  Abstract Objective: To discuss the effect of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the M classification of esophageal carcinoma, and to analyze the factors that affect the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma after radiotherapy. Methods: Data from esophageal carcinoma patients with supraclavicular lymph node metastases who were admitted to The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2005 to December 2009 were collected. There were 152 patients in the current retrospective study. A total of 95 patients with primary tumors received radiotherapy, whereas 57 underwent surgery. Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis was found in 81 cases after the treatment for primary esophageal carcinoma. Of the 81 cases, metastasis was found in 71 upon initial diagnosis. A total of 141 patients with supraclavicular lymph-node metastasis received radiotherapy, whereas 11 did not. Results: Follow-ups for all patients were done 2 to 68 months after release, with a median follow-up time of 17 months. After radiotherapy for the supraclavicular lymph node, 74 patients had complete remission, 59 had partial remission, 5 had no change, and 3 patients had progressive disease. Until the end of the follow-up, 40 of the 81 patients survived. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival ( OS ) rates were 69.1%, 37.4%, and 24.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, time of supraclavicular lymph-node metastasis, the presence of unilateral or bilateral nodal metastasis, and the therapeutic effect of the enlarged lymph nodes and visceral metastasis were independent factors for the survivals ( P < 0.05 ). The regional nodal metastasis and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were found in 39 ( N group ) and 71 ( M group ) patients, respectively, when the primary esophageal carcinoma was diagnosed. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of the N group were 82.1%, 54.1%, and 31.0%, respectively, and 56.3%, 28.1%, and 21.7% for the M group, respectively ( P = 0.041 ). The M group was divided into groups M1a and M1b. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 60.0%, 27.3%, and 27.3% for M1a, and 54.9%, 28.7%, and 19.0% for M1b, respectively ( P = 0.930 ). Based on the 6th edition of esophageal cancer staging, visceral metastasis was found in 48 cases during or after supraclavicular nodal metastasis was observed, whereas nodal metastasis was not found in the other 104 cases. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 62.5%, 17.5%, and 5.8% for the group with nodal metastasis and 72.1%, 47.0%, and 32.9% for the group without nodal metastasis, respectively ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion:  Esophageal carcinoma patients with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, regional nodal metastasis, and visceral metastasis have different survival rates. Differences were evident in the prognosis of patients with simple metastasis to the supraclavicular lymph nodes and those with combined metastasis in internal organs. Further studies are warranted on whether supraclavicular lymph node enlargement, based on its staging, should be considered as distant metastasis. The survival rates of patients with upper, middle, and inferior esophageal carcinoma were not significantly different. Age, time of supraclavicular lymph node enlargement with primary esophageal carcinoma, unilateral or bilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, the short-term curative effect of enlarged lymph nodes, and visceral metastasis are independent factors for patient survival.

     

/

返回文章
返回