肺癌患病风险关键基因筛选

黄东兰 邹建军 张积仁 郑燕芳

黄东兰, 邹建军, 张积仁, 郑燕芳. 肺癌患病风险关键基因筛选[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39(23): 1890-1895. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.23.006
引用本文: 黄东兰, 邹建军, 张积仁, 郑燕芳. 肺癌患病风险关键基因筛选[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39(23): 1890-1895. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.23.006
Donglan HUANG, Jianjun ZOU, Jiren ZHANG, Yanfang ZHENG. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Key Risk Genes in Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 39(23): 1890-1895. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.23.006
Citation: Donglan HUANG, Jianjun ZOU, Jiren ZHANG, Yanfang ZHENG. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Key Risk Genes in Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 39(23): 1890-1895. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.23.006

肺癌患病风险关键基因筛选

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.23.006
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    郑燕芳   zyfcn@yahoo.com

Bioinformatics Analysis of the Key Risk Genes in Lung Cancer

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  筛选肺癌患病风险相关的关键基因, 为进一步的相关性研究提供参考。   方法  基于文献挖掘的方法统计出肺癌患病风险相关基因, 运用生物信息学方法对上述基因进行分析。   结果  近10年内的文献共涉及312个基因, 其中不同分级的GO分类762种, KEGG通路81种, 而ln大于0且P值≤0.001的GO分类有70种, KEGG通路8种, 两者主要与细胞生理、代谢、增殖、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡、细胞周期、MAPK信号通路有关。在线String软件构建的蛋白网络图提示这些基因的表达产物大部分之间存在着密切的相互作用关系, 同时发现上述基因中307个可翻译成蛋白并参与网络构建。进一步运用Cytoscape软件将"String"软件所构建的蛋白网络图可视化及量化同时筛选出24个关键基因。   结论  肺癌患病风险相关基因种类繁多, 针对关键基因的大样本跨种族高质量肺癌患病风险临床研究是未来的研究方向。

     

  • 图  1  肺癌患病风险相关基因表达相应蛋白网络图

    图中黄色方框标记点核心节点,红圈标记的点为孤点节点

    Figure  1.  Protein-protein network built by using the Online String software

    图  2  肺癌患病风险相关基因表达相应蛋白网络图的关键节点

    图中黄色节点为关键基因在网络中心位置

    Figure  2.  Key nodes of the protein-protein network visualized by the Cytoscape software

    表  1  肺癌患病风险相关基因主要GO功能分类

    Table  1.   Major gene ontology classification of proteins that were expressed by the lung cancer risk genes

    表  2  肺癌患病风险相关基因涉及的KEGG通路

    Table  2.   Pathways of proteins that were expressed by the lung cancer risk genes in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

    表  3  肺癌患病风险相关的24个关键候选基因表

    Table  3.   Twenty-four key candidate genes of lung cancer

  • [1] Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516
    [2] Bruske-Hohlfeld I. Environmental and occupational risk factors for lung cancer[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2009, 472: 3-23.
    [3] Brenner DR, McLaughlin JR, Hung RJ. Previous lung diseases and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(3): e17479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017479
    [4] Yin J, Vogel U, Ma Y, et al. HapMap-based study of the DNA repair gene ERCC2 and lung cancer susceptibility in a Chinese population[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2009, 30(7): 1181 -1185. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp107
    [5] Truong T, Sauter W, McKay JD, et al. International Lung Cancer Consortium: co-ordinated association study of 10 potential lung cancer susceptibility variants[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2010, 31(4): 625-633. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq001
    [6] Chang JT, Nevins JR. GATHER: a systems approach to interpreting genomicsignatures[J]. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(23): 2926-2933. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl483
    [7] Szklarczy D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011, 39(Database issue): D561-568.
    [8] Kohl M, Wiese S, Warscheid B. Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2011, 696: 291-303.
    [9] Scardoni G, Petterlini M, Laudanna C. Analyzing biological network parameterswith CentiScaPe[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(21): 2857-2859. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp517
    [10] Risch A, Plass C. Lung cancer epigenetics and genetics[J]. Int J Cancer, 2008, 123(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23605
    [11] Kiyohara C, Yoshimasu K, Takayama K, et al. Lung cancer susceptibility: are we on our way to identifying a high-risk group[J]. Future Oncol, 2007, 3(6): 617-627. doi: 10.2217/14796694.3.6.617
    [12] Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium[J]. Nat Genet, 2000, 25(1): 25-29. doi: 10.1038/75556
    [13] Marden JI. Hypothesis testing: From values to Bayes. factors[J]. J Am Statist Assoc, 2000, 95(452): 1316-1320.
    [14] Yang M, Choi Y, Hwangbo B, et al. Combined effects of genetic polymorphisms in six selected genes on lung cancer susceptibility[J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 57(2): 135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.03.005
    [15] Honma HN, De Capitani EM, Perroud MW Jr, et al. Influence of p53 codon 72 exon 4, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1* B polymorphisms in lung cancer risk in a Brazilian population[J]. Lung Cancer, 2008, 61(2): 152-162. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.014
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  45
  • HTML全文浏览量:  43
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-04-07
  • 修回日期:  2012-07-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回