张秀强, 岳东升, 王长利. 两种术式治疗老年Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 42(7): 386-391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20142128
引用本文: 张秀强, 岳东升, 王长利. 两种术式治疗老年Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 42(7): 386-391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20142128
Xiuqiang ZHANG, Dongsheng YUE, Changli WANG. Prognostic analysis of two surgical procedures in the treatment of elderly stage I non-small lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 42(7): 386-391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20142128
Citation: Xiuqiang ZHANG, Dongsheng YUE, Changli WANG. Prognostic analysis of two surgical procedures in the treatment of elderly stage I non-small lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 42(7): 386-391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20142128

两种术式治疗老年Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的预后分析

Prognostic analysis of two surgical procedures in the treatment of elderly stage I non-small lung cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨不同手术方式(肺楔形切除和肺叶切除)对70岁以上Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析于2000年1 月至2006年1 月230 例接受手术治疗的70岁以上Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料,对其预后和影响预后的临床因素进行分析。结果:单因素分析结果显示,吸烟史、T 分期、手术方式、淋巴结清扫是患者预后的影响因素(P < 0.05)。 多因素分析提示,手术方式、T 分期、淋巴结清扫均是影响70岁以上Ⅰ期NSCLC 患者预后的独立因素(P < 0.05)。 肺楔形切除组5 年生存率42.2%(35/ 83),肺叶切除组5 年生存率50.3%(74/ 147),组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 进一步分层分析T 1a 的Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者,行肺楔形切除和肺叶切除的5 年生存率差异无统计学意义(51.9% vs . 53.3% ,P > 0.05)。与肺叶切除组相比,肺楔形切除组手术时间短(P = 0.035)、术中失血少(P = 0.031)、术后住院时间短(P = 0.045)。 结论:肺叶切除+ 系统性淋巴结清扫术仍是70岁以上Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者首选的手术方式;T 1a 期患者行肺楔形切除可获得与肺叶切除相近的远期收益,同时肺组织损失较小,对肺功能差的高龄T 1a 期患者推荐行肺楔形切除术。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the prognostic influence of wedge resection and lobectomy in non- small cell lung cancer pa -tients over 70years old. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted in 230 stage-I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (> 70years old) who underwent surgery between January 2000and January 2006. Survival and clinical characteristics of these patients were analyzed.Results: Results of univariate analysis indicated that smoking history, T grading, surgical procedure, and lymphadenec-tomy were the factors that affected patient prognosis ( P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that surgical procedure, T grading, and lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors of stage-I NSCLC patients over 70years old (P<0.05). The 5-year survival rates were 42.2% and 50.3% in wedge resection and lobectomy cases, respectively, with statistically significant difference between the two (P<0.05). Further stratified analysis of stage-I patients with T 1a indicated that no statistical significance existed in the5-year overall sur -vival rate between the wedge resection and lobectomy groups ( 51.9% and 53.3% respectively,P>0.05). Compared with lobectomy, pa-tients who underwent wedge resection had shorter operative time ( P=0.035), less postoperative bleeding ( P=0.031), and shorter postop-erative hospital stay ( P=0.045). Conclusion:Lobectomy, followed by systematic lymphadenectomy, was still the preferred surgical pro-cedure for NSCLC patients over70years old. However, for patients with T 1a, wedge resection may have comparable long-term surviv -al benefit with lobectomy. However, wedge resection results in less damage of the lung tissues. For elderly patients with poor lung func -tion, wedge resection can be the preferred choice.

     

/

返回文章
返回