唐玮, 刘剑仑, 杨华伟, 蒋奕, 韦薇. 整形保乳术与常规保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的比较分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43(6): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2016.06.029
引用本文: 唐玮, 刘剑仑, 杨华伟, 蒋奕, 韦薇. 整形保乳术与常规保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的比较分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43(6): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2016.06.029
Wei TANG, Jianlun LIU, Huawei YANG, Yi JIANG, Wei WEI. Clinical comparative study of oncoplastic and standard breast- conserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 43(6): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2016.06.029
Citation: Wei TANG, Jianlun LIU, Huawei YANG, Yi JIANG, Wei WEI. Clinical comparative study of oncoplastic and standard breast- conserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 43(6): 235-239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2016.06.029

整形保乳术与常规保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的比较分析

Clinical comparative study of oncoplastic and standard breast- conserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨整形保乳术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾性分析2011年1 月至2013年12月广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院行整形保乳术组(67例)与常规保乳术组(117 例)的乳腺癌患者临床病理资料,比较两组的术后并发症、美容效果满意度、切除组织重量、手术切缘及二次扩切手术率。结果:整形保乳术组发生血清肿10例、血肿3 例、切口愈合不良2 例,常规保乳术组发生血清肿57例、血肿17例、切口愈合不良14例,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。 整形保乳术组美容效果满意度优于常规保乳术组,差异具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。 整形保乳术组的切除组织重量、最小手术切缘及最大手术切缘均优于常规保乳术组,差异具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。 两组患者二次扩切手术率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论:整形保乳术不仅能有效保证保乳手术切缘,降低手术并发症发生率,而且能获得更好的美容效果满意度,是一种安全有效的保乳手术方式。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To assess the efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) in the treatment of early breast cancer. Methods: The clinicopathological data of breast cancer patients who were treated with OBCS ( 67cases) and standard breast-conserving surgery (SBCS; 117 cases) in Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Postop-erative complication, specimen weight, margins, and surgery re-excision rate between the two groups were compared. Results:Sero -ma ( 14. 9% versus 48. 7%,P<0. 001 ), hematoma ( 4. 5% versus 14. 5%,P=0. 035 ), and poor wound healing ( 3. 0% versus 11. 9%,P=0. 036 ) were more common in the SBCS group than in the OBCS group. The patient satisfaction in the OBCS group was statistically higher than in the SBCS group ( P<0. 05). Compared with standard surgery, oncoplastic techniques can be employed for significantly larger tumors (25. 04mm versus21. 14mm, P<0. 001 ). OBCS resulted in higher mean specimen weights (92. 24g versus 57. 44g, P<0. 001 ), wider clear nearest margins (12. 04mm versus9. 58mm, P<0. 001 ), and wider furthest margins ( 24. 16mm versus15. 24mm, P<0. 001 ). No statisti -cal increase was observed in further surgery re-excision of margins. Conclusion: OBCS is more successful than standard wide local exci -sion in treating larger tumors and obtaining wider radial margins. Oncoplastic approach showed no increase in postoperative complica -tion rate. The postoperative complication was excellent. OBCS is a safe and effective procedure for early breast cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回