吴楠, 于津浦, 赵晶, 赵洋, 穆坤, 张军, 金钊, 刘俊田. 二代测序检测乳腺癌易感基因在乳腺癌发病风险预测及临床治疗中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2017, 44(20): 1024-1028. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2017.20.203
引用本文: 吴楠, 于津浦, 赵晶, 赵洋, 穆坤, 张军, 金钊, 刘俊田. 二代测序检测乳腺癌易感基因在乳腺癌发病风险预测及临床治疗中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2017, 44(20): 1024-1028. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2017.20.203
WU Nan, YU Jinpu, ZHAO Jing, ZHAO Yang, MU Kun, ZHANG Jun, JIN Zhao, LIU Juntian. Second generation sequencing detection breast cancer susceptibility gene variants for risk prediction and clinical treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 44(20): 1024-1028. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2017.20.203
Citation: WU Nan, YU Jinpu, ZHAO Jing, ZHAO Yang, MU Kun, ZHANG Jun, JIN Zhao, LIU Juntian. Second generation sequencing detection breast cancer susceptibility gene variants for risk prediction and clinical treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 44(20): 1024-1028. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2017.20.203

二代测序检测乳腺癌易感基因在乳腺癌发病风险预测及临床治疗中的应用

Second generation sequencing detection breast cancer susceptibility gene variants for risk prediction and clinical treatment

  • 摘要:
      目的  通过二代测序技术筛选乳腺癌易感基因突变位点,探讨其对乳腺癌风险预测、临床干预及预后指导的意义。
      方法  采取2013年11月至2015年7月272例就诊天津医科大学肿瘤医院的乳腺癌患者146例、高危人群71例及健康者55例3组样本的外周血,采用二代测序技术进行DNA检测。采用Amplicon方法筛选BRCA1、BRCA2、PTEN、STK11、TP53及BAP1全外显子区域有价值的突变位点,分析3组的基因突变发生率及乳腺癌患者易感基因突变与临床病理特征之间的相关性。
      结果  经筛选获得177个突变位点,去重后共得到67个突变位点,其中包括50个单核苷酸突变(single nucleotide variants,SNVs)、8个无义突变(non-sense mutation)和9个插入缺失突变(insertion-deletions,InDels)。3组突变位点中31个突变位点收录于ExAC数据库,40个突变位点收录于Clin Var数据库。本研究中21个新发现的突变位点在ExAC、Clin Var或db SNP数据库中均未提及。统计分析发现85.1%(57/67)的突变发生于乳腺癌患者及高危人群中,且突变阳性乳腺癌患者有较高的淋巴结转移率(P=0.010)及病理分期(P=0.002),致病性突变的乳腺癌患者的肿瘤家族史(P=0.005)及三阴性乳腺癌比例(P=0.009)均高于非致病性突变者。
      结论  乳腺癌易感基因突变位点在乳腺癌风险预测、临床治疗及预后评价方面具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the function of breast cancer susceptibility gene variants in predicting breast cancer risk and guiding clinical treatment through DNA sequencing.
      Methods  This study involved 146 patients, 71 high-risk cases, and 55 healthy people, totaling 272 cases. The subjects were treated in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from November 2013 to July 2015. Genomic DNA was sequenced by a second generation sequencing platform. All exon areas of six common breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, STK11, TP53, and RAP1) were sequenced through amplicon sequencing method. Meaningful variants including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertion-deletions (InDels) and nonsense mutations were selected and statistical methods, such as t test and χ2 test, were used to analyze the statistical differences in incidence rates among three groups. Results: A total of 177 meaningful variants were confirmed, including 50 SNVs, 8 nonsense mutations, and 9 InDels. Among the variants, 31 were recorded in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), 40 were noted in ClinVar database, and 21 were not encoded in the present database, which were defined as new variants in this study. Conversely, 57 variants (85.1%) were found in breast cancer patients and high-risk cases, and the incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis (P=0.010) and pathological stages (P=0.002) in mutation positive patients were both higher than mutation negative patients. Moreover, the percentage of family history of cancer (P=0.005) and triple negative breast cancer (P=0.009) were both higher in patients carrying pathogenic mutations than in nonpathogenic patients.
      Conclusion  Breast cancer susceptibility gene variants may not only be a tool used to predict the risk of getting breast cancer but also a meaningful guideline for the clinical treatment and prognosis evaluation.

     

/

返回文章
返回