徐晓燕, 阎昭, 王雨萌, 孟昭婷, 陈金良, 王青山, 林丽, 苏雨栋, 丁少峰, 朱琳, 陈鹏. PAP动态监测血浆cfDNA在进展期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(2): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.02.977
引用本文: 徐晓燕, 阎昭, 王雨萌, 孟昭婷, 陈金良, 王青山, 林丽, 苏雨栋, 丁少峰, 朱琳, 陈鹏. PAP动态监测血浆cfDNA在进展期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(2): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.02.977
Xu Xiaoyan, Yan Zhao, Wang Yumeng, Meng Zhaoting, Chen Jinliang, Wang Qingshan, Lin Li, Su Yudong, Ding Shaofeng, Zhu Lin, Chen Peng. Application of PAP PCR to monitor plasma cfDNA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(2): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.02.977
Citation: Xu Xiaoyan, Yan Zhao, Wang Yumeng, Meng Zhaoting, Chen Jinliang, Wang Qingshan, Lin Li, Su Yudong, Ding Shaofeng, Zhu Lin, Chen Peng. Application of PAP PCR to monitor plasma cfDNA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(2): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.02.977

PAP动态监测血浆cfDNA在进展期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗中的应用

Application of PAP PCR to monitor plasma cfDNA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨焦磷酸化激活聚合反应(pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization,PAP)动态监测血浆cfDNA在进展期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者治疗中的应用。
      方法  收集2016年3月至2017年6月就诊的进展期NSCLC患者85例,采用PAP核酸扩增实时荧光PCR法与扩增阻滞突变系统(amplication refractory mutation system, ARMS)实时荧光PCR法检测血浆cfDNA的EGFR突变状况,比较组织与血浆及PAP法与ARMS-PCR检测结果的一致性;对突变阳性的38例患者采用PAP动态监测血浆基因突变状况。
      结果  血浆与组织突变检测结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.092)。PAP与ARMS-PCR突变检测结果差异亦无统计学意义(P=0.210)。血浆cfDNA EGFR基因突变的检出率,在疾病进展者中较未进展者中高(62.5% vs. 21.3%,P < 0.001)。
      结论  PAP可用于血浆cfDNA突变检测及动态监测以提前获得疾病进展的信息。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the application of pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization (PAP) to monitor plasma cfDNA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
      Methods  A total of 85 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC between March 2016 and June 2017 were enrolled in the present study. EGFR mutations in cfDNA extracted from the plasma were detected using PAP and ARMS-PCR technology. The concordance analysis of EGFR mutations involved plasma vs. tumor tissue and PAP vs. ARMS-PCR. Furthermore, 38 EGFR-positive patients were selected to monitor EGFR mutations with PAP.
      Results  No statistical differences in EGFR mutations were observed between plasma and tumor tissue (P=0.092), as well as PAP and ARMS-PCR (P=0.210). The detection rate of EGFR mutations in cfDNA was higher in the progressor than in the non-progressor (62.5% vs. 21.3%, P < 0.001).
      Conclusions  PAP can be used for detecting and monitoring EGFR mutations in cfDNA to predict disease progression.

     

/

返回文章
返回