CT定量参数预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的临床价值

韩丽珠 叶兆祥 李绪斌 张鹏 王一棣

韩丽珠, 叶兆祥, 李绪斌, 张鹏, 王一棣. CT定量参数预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的临床价值[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(6): 286-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.06.099
引用本文: 韩丽珠, 叶兆祥, 李绪斌, 张鹏, 王一棣. CT定量参数预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的临床价值[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(6): 286-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.06.099
Han Lizhu, Ye Zhaoxiang, Li Xubin, Zhang Peng, Wang Yidi. The clinical value of predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary mixed ground-glass nodules by CT quantitative parameters[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(6): 286-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.06.099
Citation: Han Lizhu, Ye Zhaoxiang, Li Xubin, Zhang Peng, Wang Yidi. The clinical value of predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary mixed ground-glass nodules by CT quantitative parameters[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(6): 286-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.06.099

CT定量参数预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的临床价值

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.06.099
基金项目: 

科技部国家重点研发计划项目 2016YFC0905501

科技部国家重点研发计划项目 2016YFE0103000

详细信息
    作者简介:

    韩丽珠  专业方向为肺部肿瘤影像的诊断及研究。E-mail:hanlizhu2015@163.com

    通讯作者:

    叶兆祥   yezhaoxiang@163.com

The clinical value of predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary mixed ground-glass nodules by CT quantitative parameters

Funds: 

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFC0905501

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFE0103000

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨CT定量参数对肺混合磨玻璃结节侵袭性的预测价值。  方法  回顾性分析天津医科大学肿瘤医院2013年1月至2016年9月经手术病理证实的164例肺混合磨玻璃结节(mixed ground glass nodules,mGGNs)患者的CT图像。利用受试者工作曲线(ROC)及Logistic回归分析法评估微浸润腺癌(minimally invasive adenocarcinoma,MIA)和浸润性腺癌(invasive adenocarcinoma,IAC)的CT定量参数(肺窗最大径、肺窗最大径的最大垂直径、肺窗病灶体积、平均CT值、纵隔窗最大径、纵隔窗最大径的最大垂直径、纵隔窗病灶体积以及肿瘤影消失率(tumor disappearance rate,TDR)差异。  结果  Logistic回归分析显示病灶肺窗最大径(OR=3.080,95%CI:1.135~8.355,P=0.027)及纵隔窗最大径(OR=5.881,95%CI:1.634~21.166,P=0.007)可独立预测mGGNs的侵袭性;两者联合应用所对应的曲线下面积为0.855,灵敏度为77.61%,特异度为86.67%,其截断点对应的肺窗最大径和纵隔窗最大径分别为1.902 cm和1.273 cm。  结论  CT定量参数有助于预测评估肺混合磨玻璃结节的侵袭性,病灶肺窗最大径及纵隔窗最大径是其独立预测因子。

     

  • 图  1  肺窗及纵隔窗示例

    A:病灶的轮廓以及肺窗最大径(a)和肺窗最大径的最大垂直径(b);B:病灶的纵隔最大径(c)和纵隔窗最大径的最大垂直径(d)

    图  2  肺窗最大径联合纵隔窗最大径的ROC曲线

    曲线下面积(AUC)为0.855(95%CI:0.786~0.923,P < 0.001),灵敏度为77.61%,特异度为86.67%

    表  1  164例mGGNs的分类情况

    表  2  两组中CT定量参数的分析

    表  3  各参数的ROC曲线分析

    表  4  ROC曲线成对比较有差异的参数

  • [1] Oh JY, Kwon SY, Yoon HI, et al. Clinical significance of a solitary ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesion of the lung detected by chest CT [J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 55(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.009
    [2] Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KSI, et al. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons[J]. Radi, 2007, 245(1):267-275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061682
    [3] Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Thora Oncol, 2011, 6(2):244-285. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221
    [4] Dembitzer FR, Flores RM, Parides MK, et al. Impact of histologic subtyping on outcome in lobar vs sublobar resections for lung cancer: a pilot study[J]. Chest, 2014, 146(1):175-181. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2506
    [5] Yoshimoto K, Nomori H, Mori T, et al. Quantification of the impact of segmentectomy on pulmonary function by perfusion single-photon-emission computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography[J]. J Thora Cardi Surg, 2009, 137(5):1200-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.028
    [6] Macke RA, Schuchert MJ, Odell DD, et al. Parenchymal preserving anatomic resections result in less pulmonary function loss in patients with Stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Thora Cardi Surg, 2015, (10):49. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.793.864&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    [7] Yu Y, Jian H, Shen L, et al. Lymph node involvement influenced by lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in tumor size ≤3 cm disease: A study of 2268 cases[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(11):1714-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.247
    [8] Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, et al. Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results[J]. Korean J Radi, 2007, 8(1):22-31. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.1.22
    [9] Gao F, Ge XJ, Li M, et al. CT diagnosis of different pathological types of ground-glass nodules[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2014, 36(3):188-192. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262016233_CT_diagnosis_of_different_pathological_types_of_ground-glass_nodules
    [10] Lee SM, Goo JM, Lee KH, et al. CT findings of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) of the lung and comparison of solid portion measurement methods at CT in 52 patients[J]. Eur Radi, 2015, 25 (8):2318-2325. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3616-4
    [11] Si MJ, Tao XF, Du GY, et al. Thin-section computed tomography-histopathologic comparisons of pulmonary focal interstitial fibrosis, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma with pure ground-glass opacity [J]. Eur J Radi, 2016, 85(10):1708-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.012
    [12] Yanagawa M, Johkoh T, Noguchi M, et al. Radiological prediction of tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma on thin-section CT[J]. Med, 2017, 96(11):e6331. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006331
    [13] Zhang Y, Shen Y, Qiang JW, et al. HRCT features distinguishing preinvasive from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules[J]. Eur Radi, 2016, 26(9):2921-2928. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4131-3
    [14] Son JY, Lee HY, Kim JH, et al. Quantitative CT analysis of pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules for distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma from non-invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma: the added value of using iodine mapping[J]. Eur Radi, 2016, 26(1): 43-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3816-y
    [15] Kadota K, Villena-Vargas J, Yoshizawa A, et al. Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung in patients with stage Ⅰ disease[J]. Am J Surg Path, 2014, 38(4):448-460. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000134
    [16] Yanagawa M, Tanaka Y, Kusumoto M, et al. Automated assessment of malignant degree of small peripheral adenocarcinomas using volumetric CT data: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors[J]. Lung Cancer, 2010, 70(3):286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.009
    [17] Ding H, Shi J, Zhou X, et al. Value of CT characteristics in predicting invasiveness of adenocarcinoma presented as pulmonary groundglass nodules[J]. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 2017, 65(2): 136-141.
    [18] Liu Y, Sun H, Zhou F, et al. Imaging features of TSCT predict the classification of pulmonary preinvasive lesion, minimally and invasive adenocarcinoma presented as ground glass nodules[J]. Lung Cancer, 2017, (108):192-197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500217302660
    [19] Eguchi T, Yoshizawa A, Kawakami S, et al. Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness[J]. PloS One, 2014, 9(5):e97867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097867
    [20] Matsuguma H, Oki I, Nakahara R, et al. Comparison of three measurements on computed tomography for the prediction of less in vasiveness in patients with clinical stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thora Surg, 2013, 95(6):1878-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.022
    [21] Takamochi K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al. Pathologic N0 status in pulmonary adenocarcinoma is predictable by combining serum carcinoembryonic antigen level and computed tomographic findings [J]. J Thora Cardiova Surg, 2001, 122(2):325-330. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.114355
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  142
  • HTML全文浏览量:  26
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-09-29
  • 修回日期:  2017-12-11
  • 刊出日期:  2018-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回