赵洪伟, 何欣, 成忠平, 王凯元, 周鹏. 腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹部肿瘤微创手术术中及术后镇痛的临床观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(8): 398-401. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.08.232
引用本文: 赵洪伟, 何欣, 成忠平, 王凯元, 周鹏. 腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹部肿瘤微创手术术中及术后镇痛的临床观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(8): 398-401. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.08.232
Zhao Hongwei, He Xin, Cheng Zhongping, Wang Kaiyuan, Zhou Peng. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of abdominal tumor patients treated with minimally invasive surgery[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(8): 398-401. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.08.232
Citation: Zhao Hongwei, He Xin, Cheng Zhongping, Wang Kaiyuan, Zhou Peng. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of abdominal tumor patients treated with minimally invasive surgery[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 45(8): 398-401. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.08.232

腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹部肿瘤微创手术术中及术后镇痛的临床观察

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia of abdominal tumor patients treated with minimally invasive surgery

  • 摘要:
      目的  观察超声引导下腹横肌平面(transversus abdominis plane,TAP)阻滞对微创腹部肿瘤手术镇痛和术中血流动力学的影响。
      方法  选取2016年2月至2016年8月于天津医科大学肿瘤医院行腹部肿瘤微创手术的60例患者,随机分为全麻组(G组)和全麻联合TAP阻滞组(G+T组)。G+T组在麻醉诱导后行双侧TAP阻滞。记录两组患者基本信息、手术时间、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间、术中瑞芬太尼用量。记录切皮前、后5 min,手术开始后30 min、手术结束时的平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)。采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS),评估定向力恢复即刻、术后2、6、12、24 h患者的疼痛程度。当VAS评分>4时,自控静脉镇痛(patient controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)给药,记录使用次数及不良反应情况。
      结果  与G组相比,G+T组的术中瑞芬太尼用量、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间均明显降低(P < 0.05)。G组中,和切皮前基础值相比,切皮后5min及手术开始后30min的MAP和HR均明显增高(P < 0.05);而G+T组,术中MAP和HR均未见显著性改变(P>0.05)。同时,G+T组在切皮后5 min和手术开始后30 min的MAP和HR均低于G组(P < 0.05)。与G组相比,术后2、6、12 h,G+T组VAS评分显著性降低(P < 0.05)。
      结论  全麻联合TAP阻滞能降低微创腹部肿瘤手术术中阿片类药物用量,达到更好的镇痛效果和血流动力学稳定状态,降低术后不良反应的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
      Methods  Sixty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients with abdominal tumor, undergoing laparoscopic/ robotic surgery were randomly assigned into two groups: one group undergoing general anesthesia (G group) and the other undergoing general anesthesia combined with transversus abdominis plane block (G+T group). After induction of general anesthesia in the G+T group, the patients received transversus abdominis plane block with injection of 15 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side, guided by ultrasound. The operation time, resuscitation time, orientation recovery time, and the dosage of remifentanyl were recorded and compared. During surgery, the MAP and HR at different time points (5 min before, after surgical incision; 30 min after the surgery beginning; surgery finished) between the two groups were recorded and compared. Additionally, the VAS scores at different postoperative time points were compared between the two groups.
      Results  Compared to the G group, the resuscitation time, orientation recovery time and the dosage of remifentanyl in the G+T group were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). In G group, compared to the basic value, the MAP and HR at 5 min and 30 min after surgical incision were significantly increased (P < 0.05); whereas in the G+T group, the MAP and HR remained stable at different time points (P>0.05). Moreover, compared to the G group, the VAS score in the G+T group was significantly lower at 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions  General anesthesia combined with transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery reduces the intraoperative and postoperative remifentanil consumption, improves the efficacy of perioperative analgesia, and enhances the patient's recovery after surgery.

     

/

返回文章
返回