基于磁共振成像乳腺癌远处转移预测模型的研究

汤加 马文娟 刘君君 邵真真 刘佩芳

汤加, 马文娟, 刘君君, 邵真真, 刘佩芳. 基于磁共振成像乳腺癌远处转移预测模型的研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(7): 337-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.07.130
引用本文: 汤加, 马文娟, 刘君君, 邵真真, 刘佩芳. 基于磁共振成像乳腺癌远处转移预测模型的研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(7): 337-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.07.130
Tang Jia, Ma Wenjuan, Liu Junjun, Shao Zhenzhen, Liu Peifang. Prediction model for distant metastasis of breast cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(7): 337-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.07.130
Citation: Tang Jia, Ma Wenjuan, Liu Junjun, Shao Zhenzhen, Liu Peifang. Prediction model for distant metastasis of breast cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(7): 337-341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.07.130

基于磁共振成像乳腺癌远处转移预测模型的研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.07.130
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 81801781

详细信息
    作者简介:

    汤加  专业方向为乳腺影像诊断。E-mail:jiatang_93@126.com

    通讯作者:

    刘佩芳  cjr.liupeifang@vip.163.com

Prediction model for distant metastasis of breast cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging

Funds: 

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801781

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  建立基于平扫磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)和动态对比增强(dynamic contrast enhanced,DCE)-MRI影像特征参数的乳腺癌远处转移预测模型。  方法  回顾性分析2011年1月至2016年12月3 032例于天津医科大学肿瘤医院行乳腺MRI检查并经病理证实为乳腺浸润性癌患者的临床资料,根据纳入标准筛选出转移组93例和非转移组186例。分析转移组远处转移部位与分子分型的关系,同时对两组MRI影像特征进行单因素分析及多因素Logistics回归分析,获得独立预测因子并建立预测模型。  结果  转移组中Luminal型、HER-2过表达型、三阴性乳腺癌最常见远处转移部位分别为骨、肝脏、肺脏。单因素分析结果显示,两组间的病变类型、是否多发、T1WI和T2WI信号均匀度及病灶最大径进行比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistics回归分析结果显示,病变类型、是否多发、T2WI信号均匀度及病灶最大径为独立预测因子。根据独立预测因子建立的预测模型准确率、敏感度、特异度和受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)下面积(area under receiver operat? ing characteristic curve,AUC)分别为82.8%、85.7%、75.0%和0.801。  结论  基于MRI影像特征的模型对预测乳腺癌远处转移具有潜在价值。

     

  • 图  1  乳腺癌转移病变MRI表现特征

    A,B:平扫横断面脂肪抑制T2WI,病变内部信号不均匀;C:矢状面DCE-MRI增强后第一时相图,显示相邻2个肿物;D,E:DCE-MRI延迟时相横断面T1WI,与A、B同层面

    图  2  乳腺癌远处转移预测模型ROC曲线

    表  1  转移组和非转移组乳腺癌患者MRI表现特征比较

    表  2  乳腺癌患者MRI表现特征Logistics多因素回归分析

  • [1] Huang Z, Sun B, Wu S, et al. A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with breast cancer brainmetastasis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15 (5):7090-7096. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ol/15/5/7090
    [2] 崔世恩, 储兵, 凌飞海.390例原发乳腺癌远处转移与分子分型关联性的10年回顾性分析[J].中国癌症杂志, 2015, 25(10):774-779. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgazzz201510004
    [3] 曹旭晨, 高宇.女性原发浸润性乳腺癌预后指数的研究[J].天津医科大学学报, 2005, 11(4):590-595. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8147.2005.04.027
    [4] Li S, Zhao J, Zhu L, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the overall survival of stage Ⅳ breast cancer patients[J]. Cancer Med, 2017, 6(11):2586-2594. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2017.6.issue-11
    [5] Song SE, Shin SU, Moon HG, et al. MR imaging features associated with distant metastasis- free survival of patients with invasive breast cancer: a case- control study[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 162(3):559-569. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4143-6
    [6] Kim S, Kim JY, Kim DH, et al. Analysis of phyllodes tumor recurrence according to the histologic grade[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2013, 141(3):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2684-x
    [7] Genre L, Roché H, Varela L, et al. External validation of a published nomogram for prediction of brain metastasis in patients with extracerebral metastatic breast cancer and risk regression analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017, 72:200-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.019
    [8] Huang SY, Franc BL, Harnish RJ, et al. Exploration of PET and MRI radiomic features for decoding breast cancer phenotypes and prognosis[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2018, 4(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0078-2
    [9] 苗培田, 佟仲生, 郝春芳, 等.不同亚型转移性乳腺癌转移特点及预后分析[J].中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(4):228-231. http://www.cjco.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8588.shtml
    [10] Savci-Heijink CD, Halfwerk H, Hooijer GK, et al. Retrospective analysis of metastatic behaviour of breast cancer subtypes[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 150(3):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3352-0
    [11] 李芹, 牛庆亮, 杜汉旺, 等.肿块型与非肿块型乳腺癌ADC值、Ki67指数的对比分析[J].中国临床医学影像学杂志, 2018, 29(1):11-13. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zglcyxyxzz201801004
    [12] Juan MW, Yu J, Peng GX, et al. Correlation between DCE- MRI radiomics features and Ki-67 expression in invasive breast cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 16(4):5084-5090. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=237dfc82b4faa9765bee0fc6df7c879c&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [13] Ozal ST, Inci E, Gemici AA, et al. Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer[J]? Clin Imaging, 2018, 51:240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.03.022
    [14] Lynch SP, Lei X, Chavez-MacGregor M, et al. Multifocality and multicentricity in breast cancer and survival outcomes[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(12):3063-3069. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds136
    [15] Parikh J, Selmi M, Charles- Edwards G, et al. Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Radiology, 2014, 272(1):100-112. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14130569
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  108
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-28
  • 修回日期:  2019-03-11
  • 刊出日期:  2019-04-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回