室管膜下区受侵对脑胶质瘤预后的影响

彭世义 李艳萍 涂子为 李国庆

彭世义, 李艳萍, 涂子为, 李国庆. 室管膜下区受侵对脑胶质瘤预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(12): 622-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.12.268
引用本文: 彭世义, 李艳萍, 涂子为, 李国庆. 室管膜下区受侵对脑胶质瘤预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(12): 622-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.12.268
Peng Shiyi, Li Yanping, Tu Ziwei, Li Guoqing. Effect of subventricular zone invasion on prognosis of glioma patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(12): 622-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.12.268
Citation: Peng Shiyi, Li Yanping, Tu Ziwei, Li Guoqing. Effect of subventricular zone invasion on prognosis of glioma patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(12): 622-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.12.268

室管膜下区受侵对脑胶质瘤预后的影响

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.12.268
基金项目: 

江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目 20161106

详细信息
    作者简介:

    彭世义  专业方向为头颈部肿瘤放射治疗。E-mail:397353866@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    李国庆  liguoqingxyz@sina.com

Effect of subventricular zone invasion on prognosis of glioma patients

Funds: 

Science and Technology Program of Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province 20161106

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨室管膜下区(subventricular zone, SVZ)受侵对脑胶质瘤预后的影响。  方法  回顾性分析江西省肿瘤医院2010年1月至2015年7月收治的175例经病理诊断为脑胶质瘤患者的临床资料, 其中WHOⅡ级59例, Ⅲ级59例, Ⅳ级57例; 根据术前MRI检查病灶与SVZ的位置关系, 分为SVZ受侵组(SVZ+)及SVZ未受侵组(SVZ-), 其中SVZ (+)组75例, SVZ (-)组100例, 比较两组的生存时间及复发模式。  结果  中位随访时间63个月; 5年总生存率(overall survival, OS)及无进展生存率(progression-free survival, PFS)分别为42.2%、37.5%;SVZ (+)组5年OS为20.9%, SVZ (-)组为57.1%(P< 0.001);而5年PFS分别为15.3%、44.1%(P< 0.001)。SVZ (+)组手术全切率更低(P< 0.001), 有更多大病灶(最大径≥ 5.0 cm)及Ⅳ级病例(P < 0.001, P=0.018)。全组共89例复发, SVZ (+)组总复发率为62.7%, SVZ (-)组为42.0%(P=0.007), 而远处复发率分别为21.3%、7.0%(P=0.004)。  结论  SVZ受侵是影响脑胶质瘤OS、PFS的不良预后因素, 且与低的全切率、大病灶及Ⅳ级病变呈正相关; SVZ受侵增加了总复发及远处复发概率。

     

  • 图  1  SVZ受侵

    图  2  SVZ未受侵

    图  3  全组患者的OS和PFS曲线比较

    图  4  SVZ(+/-)两组患者的OS和PFS曲线比较

    图  5  瘤床区复发

    图  6  远处播散(第四脑室)

    图  7  瘤床复发及远处播散

    表  1  175例胶质瘤患者临床特征   n(%)

    表  2  影响OS、PFS的单因素分析

    表  3  影响OS、PFS的多因素分析

    表  4  两组患者是否出现复发的比较   n(%)

    表  5  两组患者复发部位的比较   n(%)

  • [1] 彭世义, 李艳萍, 陈志萍, 等.WHOⅡ级脑胶质瘤预后影响因素分析[J].中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(8):402-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.08.374
    [2] 吴帅, 李泽阳, 邱天明, 等.术中磁共振成像在脑胶质瘤中的应用[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2018, 34(4):333-337. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2018.04.003
    [3] Altmann C, Keller S, Schmidt MHH. The role of SVZ stem cells in glioblastoma[J]. Cancers, 2019, 11(4):3390.
    [4] Androutsellis-Theotokis A, Leker RR, Soldner F, et al. Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo[J]. Nature, 2006, 442 (7104):823-826. doi: 10.1038/nature04940
    [5] Groszer M. Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5549):2186-2189. doi: 10.1126/science.1065518
    [6] Wen B, Fu F, Hu L, et al. Subventricular zone predicts high velocity of tumor expansion and poor clinical outcome in patients with low grade astrocytoma[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 168(3):12-17. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=6d8d9a2c58da08a8eb98aedf16fa3234
    [7] Mistry AM, Kelly PD, Gallant JN, et al. Comparative analysis of subventricular zone glioblastoma contact and ventricular entry during resection in predicting dissemination, hydrocephalus, and survival[J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 6(3):144.
    [8] Chaichana KL, Mcgirt MJ, Frazier J, et al. Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to the lateral ventricles predicts survival following tumor resection[J]. J Neurooncol, 2008, 89(2):219-224. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9609-2
    [9] 国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局.脑胶质瘤诊疗规范(2018年版)[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2019, 35(3):217-239. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2019.03.001
    [10] Chang EL, Avalos T, Chao C, et al. An evaluation of peritumoral edema in the clinical target volume delineation for radiotherapy of glioblastoma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 68(1):144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.009
    [11] Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high- grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(11):1963- 1972. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
    [12] Liu S, Wang Y, Fan X, et al. Anatomical involvement of the subventricularzone predicts poor survival outcome in low-grade astrocytomas[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4):e0154539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154539
    [13] Mistry AM, Dewan MC, White-Dzuro GA, et al. Decreased survival in glioblastomas is specific to contact with the ventricular-subventricular zone, not subgranular zone or corpus callosum[J]. J Neurooncol, 2017, 132(2):341-349. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2374-3
    [14] Lim DA, Cha S, Mayo MC, et al. Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to neural stem cell regions predicts invasive and multifocal tumor phenotype[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2007, 9(4):424-429. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-023
    [15] Chen L, Chaichana KL, Kleinberg L, et al. Glioblastoma recurrence patterns near neural stem cell regions[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2015, 116 (2):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.032
    [16] Ho J, Ondos J, Ning H, et al. Chemoirradiation for glioblastoma multiforme: the national cancer institute experience[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8):e70745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070745
    [17] Liang HK, Kuo SH, Wang CW, et al. Adverse prognosis and distinct progression patterns after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma with synchronous subventricular zone and corpus callosum invasion[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 118(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.017
    [18] Xingyi J, Guonan C, Xin Z, et al. AbCD133 modified αct1 loaded target magnetic mesoporous silica nano-drugcarriers can sensitizes glioma cancer stem cells to tmz and have therapeutic potential on tmz resistant glioblastoma[J]. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2019, 15(7):1468-1481. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2019.2795
    [19] Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7412):522- 526. doi: 10.1038/nature11287
    [20] Cuddapah VA, Robel S, Watkins S, et al. A neurocentric perspective on glioma invasion[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2014, 15(7):455-465. doi: 10.1038/nrn3765
    [21] Roelz R, Reinacher P, Jabbarli R, et al. Surgical ventricular entry is a key risk factor for leptomeningeal metastasis of high grade gliomas[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5:17758. doi: 10.1038/srep17758
    [22] Adeberg S, Harrabi SB, Bougatf N, et al. Do increased doses to stem-cell niches during radiation therapy improve glioblastoma survival[J]? Stem Cells Int, 2016, 2016:8793462. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4939331/
    [23] Kusumawidjaja G, Gan PZ, Ong WS, et al. Dose-escalated intensitymodulated radiotherapy and irradiation of subventricular zones in relation to tumor control outcomes of patients with glioblastoma multiforme[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016, 9:1115-1122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042103
    [24] Khalifa J, Tensaouti F, Lusque A, et al. Subventricular zones: new key targets for glioblastoma treatment[J]. Radiation Oncology, 2017, 12(1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0791-2
    [25] Mathew BS, Kaliyath SB, Krishnan J, et al. Impact of subventricular zone irradiation on outcome of patients with glioblastoma[J]. J Can Res Ther 2018, 14:1202-1206. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308769498_Impact_of_Subventricular_Zone_SVZ_Irradiation_on_Outcome_of_Patients_With_Glioblastoma_Multiforme
    [26] Muracciole X, El-Amine W, Tabouret E, et al. Negative survival impact of high radiation doses to neural stem cells niches in an idhwild-type glioblastoma population[J]. Front Oncol, 2018, 4(8):426. https://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000040891500010_bdfd.html
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  69
  • HTML全文浏览量:  28
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-25
  • 修回日期:  2019-06-14
  • 刊出日期:  2019-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回