刘丽杰, 梁月祥, 何冬雷. 癌结节对胃癌患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(17): 891-896. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.17.885
引用本文: 刘丽杰, 梁月祥, 何冬雷. 癌结节对胃癌患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(17): 891-896. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.17.885
Liu Lijie, Liang Xuexiang, He Donglei. Impact of tumor deposits on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(17): 891-896. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.17.885
Citation: Liu Lijie, Liang Xuexiang, He Donglei. Impact of tumor deposits on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 46(17): 891-896. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.17.885

癌结节对胃癌患者生存预后的影响

Impact of tumor deposits on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨癌结节对胃癌患者生存预后的影响。
      方法  回顾性分析2007年1月至2012年12月海南医学院第一附属医院收治的312例胃癌患者的临床病理资料,根据术后病理标本中有无癌结节将所有患者分为癌结节阴性组和阳性组。分析癌结节与临床病理因素的关系及其对胃癌患者生存预后的影响。
      结果  本组患者中84例存在癌结节,阳性率为26.9%。单因素分析显示,Borrmann分型、肿瘤大小、浸润深度、N分期、TNM分期、脉管癌栓与癌结节阳性相关;多因素分析证实仅Borrmann分型、N分期和脉管癌栓是癌结节阳性的独立相关因素。单因素生存分析显示,年龄、肿瘤部位、Borrmann分型、肿瘤大小、TNM分期、术式、脉管癌栓和癌结节与胃癌患者预后相关。癌结节阴性组和阳性组5年生存率分别为67.5%和34.5%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。多因素生存分析显示年龄、Borrmann Ⅲ/Ⅳ型、TNM分期、脉管癌栓和癌结节是患者的独立预后因素。进一步分层分析显示,癌结节仅对N0~3a期胃癌患者预后影响有统计学意义,N3b期癌结节阴性组和阳性组患者预后无显著差异。癌结节阳性患者预后与N分期、有无脉管癌栓及术后辅助化疗独立相关。
      结论  癌结节是胃癌患者独立预后因素,可作为N0~3a期患者预后评价指标,无论分期如何,癌结节阳性者需行术后辅助化疗并密切随访。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To evaluate the prognostic impact of tumor deposits on the overall survival (OS) of gastric cancer (GC) patients.
      Methods  Between January 2007 and December 2012, 312 GC patients undergoing curative resection in The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University were enrolled. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the tumor deposit status of postoperative pathology:positive group, presence of tumor deposits and negative group, absence of tumor deposits. The correlations of tumor deposit status with clinicopathological and potential prognostic factors were analyzed.
      Results  Eighty-four (26.9%) patients had tumor deposits. There were significant differences in Borrmann type, tumor size, depth of invasion, N stage, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and lymphovascular invasion between the two groups on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that Borrmann type, N stage, and lymphovascular invasion were independently associated with the presence of tumor deposits. In univariate survival analysis, age, tumor location, Borrmann type, tumor size, TNM stage, type of gastrectomy, lymphovascular invasion, and presence of tumor deposits were found to be significant prognostic factors. GC patients with tumor deposits had a significantly lower 5-year OS rate than those without tumor deposits (5-year OS:34.5% vs. 67.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Borrmann type Ⅲ/Ⅳ, TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, and presence of tumor deposits were independent prognostic factors for this cohort. Further stratified analysis demonstrated that the significant prognostic differences between the two groups were only observed in patients with stage N0-3a disease. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with and without tumor deposits at the N3b stage. The prognosis of GC patients with tumor deposits was independently correlated with N stage, lymphovascular invasion, and postoperative chemotherapy.
      Conclusions  The presence of tumor deposits was an independent prognostic factor in GC patients and can be used as a prognostic indicator for GC patients with stage N0-3a disease. GC patients with tumor deposits should receive postoperative chemotherapy regardless of TNM stage.

     

/

返回文章
返回