李林, 文保钢, 赵秀娟, 黄裕, 李蓉, 王冬. FIGO 2018分期系统对子宫颈神经内分泌癌治疗及预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(12): 621-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.12.573
引用本文: 李林, 文保钢, 赵秀娟, 黄裕, 李蓉, 王冬. FIGO 2018分期系统对子宫颈神经内分泌癌治疗及预后的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(12): 621-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.12.573
Lin Li, Baogang Wen, Xiujuan Zhao, Yu Huang, Rong Li, Dong Wang. Effect of the FIGO 2018 staging system on the treatment and prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 47(12): 621-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.12.573
Citation: Lin Li, Baogang Wen, Xiujuan Zhao, Yu Huang, Rong Li, Dong Wang. Effect of the FIGO 2018 staging system on the treatment and prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 47(12): 621-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.12.573

FIGO 2018分期系统对子宫颈神经内分泌癌治疗及预后的影响

Effect of the FIGO 2018 staging system on the treatment and prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018分期系统对子宫颈神经内分泌癌(neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix,NECUC)患者治疗决策及预后的影响。
      方法  回顾性分析2003年1月至2019年1月65例收治于重庆大学附属肿瘤医院的NECUC患者的临床病理资料,按照FIGO 2018新分期系统再分期,与FIGO 2009老分期系统进行比较,并对预后进行单因素和多因素分析。
      结果  65例NECUC患者的中位发病年龄为46(18~70)岁,中位随访时间为23.6(4~151)个月,其中42例行根治性手术、16例行同步放化疗、3例行单纯化疗、4例拒绝治疗。截止随访时42例出现复发转移,38例死亡。按照FIGO 2018新分期系统进行再分期后,65例患者中有34例(52.3%)分期升级,大多数变化出现在ⅠB期和ⅢC期。患者的2年累积无进展生存(progression-freesurvival,PFS)率和总生存(overall survival,OS)率分别为40.5%和50.5%。单因素分析显示预后与FIGO分期、放疗、化疗及化疗疗程有显著性相关(均P < 0.05),而与肿瘤大小、化疗方案无显著性相关(均P>0.05);多因素分析显示是否行放疗是PFS的独立影响因素,而FIGO 2018新分期系统及化疗疗程是OS的独立影响因素。
      结论  FIGO 2018新分期系统对于判断NECUC预后要优于老分期系统,对于早期患者术前影像学评估淋巴结状态尤为重要,足疗程的化疗及放疗可能对改善患者的生存有益。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the effect of the FIGO 2018 staging system on the treatment strategy and prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (NECUC).
      Methods  Sixty-five patients with NECUC treated at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between January 2003 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and compared using the FIGO 2018 staging system, and FIGO 2009 staging system. A univariate Log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were used for the analysis.
      Results  The median age was 46 years (range18-70 years), and the median follow-up time was 23.6 months (range4-151 months). Forty-two patients underwent radical surgery, 16 patients received concurrent chemoradiation, 3 patients received chemotherapy alone, and 4 patients refused all treatments. As of the follow-up data, 38 patients had died, and 42 patients had relapsed. According to the FIGO 2018 staging system, 34 of the 65 patients (52.3%) experienced stage upgrades, with most of the changes occurring in stages ⅠB andⅢC. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 40.5% and 50.5%, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that prognosis was significantly related to the FIGO stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and the number of courses of chemotherapy (all P < 0.05), while the tumor size and chemotherapy regimens were not significantly associated with prognosis (all P>0.05). The multivariate analysis found that radiotherapy was an independent factor for PFS, while the FIGO 2018 staging system and the number of chemotherapy courses were independent factors of OS.
      Conclusions  The FIGO 2018 staging system is superior to the old staging system in judging the prognosis of patients with NECUC. It is especially useful for evaluating the lymph node status by preoperative imaging at an early stage. Sufficient chemotherapy courses and radiotherapy may be beneficial in improving survival.

     

/

返回文章
返回