超声引导联合全身麻醉对高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者的术中镇痛效果及术后早期转归的影响

周瑜 代俊超 毕小波

周瑜, 代俊超, 毕小波. 超声引导联合全身麻醉对高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者的术中镇痛效果及术后早期转归的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2021, 48(4): 174-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2021.04.076
引用本文: 周瑜, 代俊超, 毕小波. 超声引导联合全身麻醉对高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者的术中镇痛效果及术后早期转归的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2021, 48(4): 174-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2021.04.076
Yu Zhou, Junchao Dai, Xiaobo Bi. Effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with general anesthesia on intraoperative analgesia and early postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48(4): 174-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2021.04.076
Citation: Yu Zhou, Junchao Dai, Xiaobo Bi. Effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with general anesthesia on intraoperative analgesia and early postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48(4): 174-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2021.04.076

超声引导联合全身麻醉对高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者的术中镇痛效果及术后早期转归的影响

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2021.04.076
详细信息
    作者简介:

    周瑜  专业方向为全身麻醉复合神经阻滞镇痛的研究。E-mail:294109903@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    周瑜  zddprf@163.com

Effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with general anesthesia on intraoperative analgesia and early postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉对75岁以上高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者术中镇痛效果及术后早期转归的影响。  方法  分析2018年6月至2019年6月西南医科大学附属医院收治的75岁以上高龄肺癌患者63例,均拟行肺叶切除术,按照随机数字表法分为对照组31例、观察组32例。对照组采用全身麻醉,观察组采用超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉,比较两组手术相关指标及术后苏醒时间、术后住院时间、术中不同时间点平均动脉压和心率变化、术后肺活量、术后镇痛效果、术后康复质量、术后认知功能障碍及不良反应的发生情况。  结果  两组手术时间、麻醉时间、苏醒时间、术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组插管时、切皮时、拔管时的平均动脉压、心率均低于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组术后12、24、48 h的肺活量均高于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组术后镇痛补救率、镇痛泵按压次数、输注总量、术后6 h和术后12 h VAS评分均少于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组术后24、48、72 h的康复质量评分均高于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组术后6、12、24 h的认知功能障碍发生率低于对照组(P < 0.05);观察组术后不良反应总发生率为37.50%,低于对照组的70.97%(P < 0.05)。  结论  超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉应用于75岁以上高龄肺癌肺叶切除术患者术中镇痛效果确切,术中患者生命体征变化相对平稳,术后肺功能恢复快,术后康复质量较好,术后镇痛补救率低,疼痛轻,术后认知功能障碍发生率低,不良反应少,麻醉效果确切且风险低,安全性好。

     

  • 表  1  两组患者一般资料比较 x±sn

    表  2  两组患者手术相关情况比较 x±s

    表  3  两组患者术中各时间点平均动脉压、心率比较 x±s

    表  4  两组患者术后早期肺活量比较 x±s,L)

    表  5  两组患者术后镇痛效果比较 x±s

    表  6  两组患者术后早期康复质量比较 x±s,分)

    表  7  两组患者术后认知功能障碍发生情况比较 n(%)

    表  8  两组患者术后不良反应发生情况比较 n(%)

  • [1] Chen YX, Dai CL, Wu Z, et al. Intranasal insulin prevents anesthesiainduced cognitive impairment and chronic neurobehavioral changes[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2017, 20(9): 136-140. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC5424543/
    [2] Balaban O, Aydin T, Yaman M. Is ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block sufficient for surgical anesthesia in minor surgery at thoracal region[J]. J Clinl Anesth, 2018, 47(1): 7-8.
    [3] Zhu YJ, Zhao YZ, Fan GX, et al. Comparison of the effects of local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in elderly patients over 65 years old[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 48(1): 260-263. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919117314462
    [4] Scimia P, Basso RE, Droghetti A, et al. The ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in video- assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2017, 42(4): 537-540.
    [5] Ueshima H, Otake H. Clinical experiences of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for thoracic vertebra surgery[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2017, 38(1): 137-137.
    [6] Ahiskalioglu AA, Alici HA, Ciftci B, et al. Continuous ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for management of chronic pain[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2017, 104(3): 727-730. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29253539
    [7] Katlic MR. Video-assisted thoracic surgery utilizing local anesthesia and sedation: how I teach it[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(3): 727. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.025
    [8] Katlic MR. Five hundred seventy-six cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery using local anesthesia and sedation: lessons learned[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 226(1): 58-63. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29037478
    [9] Wilson M, Stacey S, Anwar S. Intubated versus nonintubated general anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-a case control study: a response[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2017, 32(1): 32-33. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307701730890X
    [10] Katlic MR. Five hundred seventy-six cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery using local anesthesia and sedation: lessons learned[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 226(1): 58-63. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29037478
    [11] Hwang J, Shin JS, Son JH, et al. Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(3): 1703-1710. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.10
    [12] Bonvicini D, Giacomazzi A, Pizzirani E. Use of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in breast surgery[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2017, 83(10): 1111-1112. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28492298
    [13] Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar A, et al. Ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for spine surgery[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2017, 11(2): 248-249. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203052
    [14] Gautam SKS, Das PK, Agarwal A. Comparative evaluation of continuous thoracic paravertebral block and thoracic epidural analgesia techniques for post- operative pain relief in patients undergoing open nephrectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study [J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(2): 359-364. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.194559
    [15] Aytekin İ, Şanli M, Işik AF, et al. Outcomes after lobectomy and pneumonectomy in lungcancer patients aged 70 years or older[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2017, 47(1): 307-312. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28263507
    [16] Kawaguchi Y, Hanaoka J, Oshio Y, et al. Decrease in performance status after lobectomy mean poor prognosis in elderly lung cancer patients[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(6): 1525-1530. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.37
    [17] Widder J, Van DWC, Langendijk JA. Lobectomy or sublobectomy for small non-small-cell lung cancer: the question remains[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(5): 572-573.
    [18] Singh S, Chaudhary NK. Bilateralultasound guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery: a case series[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2018, 31(3): 354-358. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29965831
    [19] Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Ciftci B, et al. Continuous ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for management of chronic pain[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2017, 10(1): 238-240. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29253539
    [20] Hung MH, Yang SM, Chen JS. Nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer[J]. J Vis Surg, 2017, 13(2): 10. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29078573
    [21] Ueshima H, Otake H. Clinical experiences of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for thoracic vertebra surgery[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2017, 38(1): 137-139.
    [22] Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block for rescue analgesia in thoracotomy after epidural failure: a case report[J]. Case Rep, 2017, 8(10): 254-256. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252539
    [23] Ohgoshi Y, Terada S, Usui Y, et al. Analgesia- related differences among the erector spinae, multifidus cervicis, and inter-semispinal plane blocks[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2018, 65(8): 958-960. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1105-3
    [24] Cesur S, Ay AN, Yayik A, et al. Ultrasound- guided erector spine plane block provides effective perioperative analgesia and anaesthesia for thoracic mass excision: a report of two cases[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2018, 38(2): 189-190.
    [25] Kelava M, Anthony D, Elsharkawy H. Continuous erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy in a lung transplant recipient[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018, 32(5): 9-11. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.04.041
    [26] Singh S, Chaudhary NK. Bilateral ultasound guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery: a case series[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2019, 31(3): 354-356. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000518
  • 加载中
表(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  75
  • HTML全文浏览量:  25
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-11-12
  • 刊出日期:  2021-02-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回