王鹏, 佘春华, 李鹏, 朴颖哲, 王晓光, 李文良. 肿瘤标志物在肺癌脑膜转移辅助诊断中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2008, 35(2): 61-64.
引用本文: 王鹏, 佘春华, 李鹏, 朴颖哲, 王晓光, 李文良. 肿瘤标志物在肺癌脑膜转移辅助诊断中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2008, 35(2): 61-64.
WANG Peng, SHE Chunhua, LI Peng, PIAO Yingzhe, WANG Xiaoguang, LI Wenliang. Significance of Tumor Markers in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Meningeal Metastasis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 35(2): 61-64.
Citation: WANG Peng, SHE Chunhua, LI Peng, PIAO Yingzhe, WANG Xiaoguang, LI Wenliang. Significance of Tumor Markers in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Meningeal Metastasis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 35(2): 61-64.

肿瘤标志物在肺癌脑膜转移辅助诊断中的应用

Significance of Tumor Markers in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Meningeal Metastasis

  • 摘要: 目的: 探讨癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和细胞角蛋白片断抗原(CYFRA21-1)3种肿瘤标志物血清及脑脊液中含量在肺癌脑膜转移辅助诊断中的应用价值,并选择最理想的脑脊液肿瘤标志物组合。 方法: 采用RocheE170全自动免疫分析仪检测35例肺癌脑膜转移患者、35例脑部良性肿瘤患者血清和脑脊液中3种肿瘤标志物的含量。脑膜转移患者根据神经系统检查、脑脊液细胞学和核磁共振检查确诊。 结果: 肺癌脑膜转移患者的血清和脑脊液中3种肿瘤标志物水平均明显高于脑良性肿瘤组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);脑膜转移患者脑脊液中肿瘤标志物水平高于血清,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。按照实验室标准值确定血清肿瘤标志物阳性标准,CEA>5μg/L,NSE>15.2μg/L,CYFRA21-1>3.3μg/L。根据受试者工作曲线确定满足正确诊断指数最大值的临界点为脑脊液检测阳性判定标准,CEA>4.7μg/L,NSE>14.6μg/L,CYFRA21-1>5.5μg/L,CEA,NSE和CYFRA21-1的敏感性和特异性分别为91.4%,91.4%;51.4%,94.3%和82.9%,97.1%。脑脊液肿瘤标志物的联合检测组合中,三项指标任意1项阳性的诊断敏感性100%,三项指标同时阳性的诊断特异性100%。 结论: 脑脊液中3种肿瘤标志物水平对于肺癌脑膜转移的诊断,尤其对于那些细胞学和核磁共振检查难以确诊的患者,具有重要的临床意义,联合检测为最佳组合。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the significance of tumor marker CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 adopted alone or in combination in the diagnosis of lung cancer meningeal metastasis. Methods: Thirty-five patients with lung cancer meningeal metastasis and 35 patients with benign brain tumor were studied. The diagnosis was based on neurological examination, MRI scan, and presence of neoplastic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Tumor marker levels in CSF and serum were measured by electrochemiluminescence technique(Elecsys 170, Roche). Results: CSF and serum tumor marker levels were significantly higher in patients with lung cancer meningeal metastasis than in patients with benign disease (P<0.01). In the CSF of the 35 patients with lung cancer meningeal metastasis, the level of all of the three tumor markers was higher than that in the controls (P<0.01). The cut-off values of tumor markers in the serum were determined according to the lab standard. The values of CEA, NSE and CYFRA 21-1 were 5μg/L, 15.2μg/L and 3.3μg/L, respectively. To determine optimal cut-off values of tumor markers in CSF, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used. The cut-off values of CSF concentration of CEA, NSE and CYFRA 21-1 were 4.7μg/L, 14.6μg/L and 5.5μg/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEA, NSE and CYFRA21- 1 in CSF were 91.4% and 91.4%, 51.4% and 94.3%, and 82.9% and 97.1%, respectively. When at least one tumor marker in CSF was positive in patients with lung cancer meningeal metastasis, the sensitivity of it was 100%. When all of the three tumor markers were positive, the specificity was 100%. Conclusion: These three tumor markers are valuable auxiliary parameters in diagnosing lung cancer meningeal metastasis. The combination of CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 is more valuable for diagnosis. It may be a complementary method in diagnosing patients without visualized tumor by cytological examination and MRI. The above results need further investigation in a larger group of patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回