袁葆琳, 张涛, 罗建奇, 张亮, 陈素群, 杨丽娜, 吴勇, 马玉英. 三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)非小细胞肺癌临床研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2008, 35(6): 306-309.
引用本文: 袁葆琳, 张涛, 罗建奇, 张亮, 陈素群, 杨丽娜, 吴勇, 马玉英. 三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)非小细胞肺癌临床研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2008, 35(6): 306-309.
YUAN Bao-lin, ZHANG Tao, LUO Jian-qi, ZHANG Liang, CHEN Su-qun, YANG Li-na, WU Yong, MA Yu-ying. The Effect of Threedimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy on Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 35(6): 306-309.
Citation: YUAN Bao-lin, ZHANG Tao, LUO Jian-qi, ZHANG Liang, CHEN Su-qun, YANG Li-na, WU Yong, MA Yu-ying. The Effect of Threedimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy on Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 35(6): 306-309.

三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)非小细胞肺癌临床研究

The Effect of Threedimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy on Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的: 研究三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和不良反应。 方法: 对52例Ⅰ~Ⅳ期NSCLC患者采用3DCRT技术治疗,并与采用常规放疗的50例患者临床资料进行对比分析。3DCRT组治疗靶区包括原发肿瘤加阳性淋巴结引流区,采用4~6个共面、非共面野照射,处方剂量DT2~3Gy/次,1次/天,5次/周,总剂量DT66~72Gy。常规RT组放疗靶区包括原发灶加同侧肺门、上纵隔或全纵隔,前后野对穿照射,DT36~40Gy后避开脊髓改斜野照射,1.8~2.0Gy/次,1次/天,5次/周,总剂量DT60~70Gy。 结果: 3DCRT组有效率(CR+PR)为90.4%,常规RT组为72.0%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);临床症状改善率分别为96.5%和86.4%。两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。3DCRT组0.5年、1年、2年生存率分别为92.3%、75.0%、42.3%,均高于常规RT组的76.0%、60.0%、30.0%;0.5年生存率两组比较有差异(P<0.05),1年、2年生存率两组间无明显差异(P>0.05)。3DCRT组与常规RT组不良反应发生率分别为12.5%和23.7%,其中急性放射性食管炎、白细胞减少两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且3DCRT组无Ⅲ级以上不良反应发生。 结论: 3DCRT治疗NSCLC有较好的近期疗效和临床症状改善率,不良反应轻,患者易耐受,可提高肿瘤控制率,提高生存质量。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of threedimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) on non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 52 cases of IIV stage NSCLC treated with 3DCRTand 50 NSCLC cases treated with conventional radiotherapy. In the 3DCRT group, only tumor and lymph nodes withmetastasis were included in the clinical target, with 46 coplane or noncoplane shoot areas, at 23 Gy/fraction, onceper day, 5 times per week, with a total dose of 6672 Gy. In the conventional RT group, the shoot area contained obvioustumor and homonymy hilum of the lung, the mediastinum superior or holinterpleural space, and circa paraprick. Whenthe total dose reached 3640 Gy, we altered the oblique portally administered radiation in order to avoid affecting thespinal cord. The regimen was DT 1.82.0 Gy/fraction, once per day, 5 times per week, with a total dose of 6070 Gy. Results: The response rate (CR+PR) was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group and 72% in the conventional RT group, with a statisti-cally significant difference(P<0.01). The rate of improvement of clinical status was 96.5% in the 3DCRT group and 86.4%in the conventional RT group (P<0.01). In the 3DCRT group, the 0.5, 1and 2year overall survival rates were 92.3%,75.0% and 42.3%, respectively. In the conventional RT group, the 0.5, 1and 2 year overall survival rates were 76%,60% and 30%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in the 0.5year overall survival rate betweenthe two groups. No significant difference was found in the 1year and 2 year overall survival rates between the twogroups. The adverse reaction rates in the 3DCRT and the conventional RT group were 12.5% and 23.7%, respectively,with a statistically significant difference between the two (P<0.05). No cases with stageⅢ or higher in the 3DCRT groupexperienced severe adverse effects. Conclusion: 3DCRT is feasible for the treatment of NSCLC. 3DCRT has good thera-peutic effects with slight adverse effects, improves clinical symptoms, and is welltolerated.

     

/

返回文章
返回