张阳, 王瑞林, 樊青霞, 李醒亚. 随机比较顺铂-醛氢叶酸/氟脲嘧啶不同给药方法治疗晚期食管癌122例疗效报告[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2004, 31(17): 983-985.
引用本文: 张阳, 王瑞林, 樊青霞, 李醒亚. 随机比较顺铂-醛氢叶酸/氟脲嘧啶不同给药方法治疗晚期食管癌122例疗效报告[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2004, 31(17): 983-985.
Zhang Yang, Wang Ruilin, Fan Qingxia, . The Efficacy of CDDP-LV/5-FU Therapy in Esophageal Carcinoma:A Report of 122 Cases —Randomly Compare the Effect of 5-FU Different Administration Methods in This Regimen on the Efficacy and Toxicity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 31(17): 983-985.
Citation: Zhang Yang, Wang Ruilin, Fan Qingxia, . The Efficacy of CDDP-LV/5-FU Therapy in Esophageal Carcinoma:A Report of 122 Cases —Randomly Compare the Effect of 5-FU Different Administration Methods in This Regimen on the Efficacy and Toxicity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 31(17): 983-985.

随机比较顺铂-醛氢叶酸/氟脲嘧啶不同给药方法治疗晚期食管癌122例疗效报告

The Efficacy of CDDP-LV/5-FU Therapy in Esophageal Carcinoma:A Report of 122 Cases —Randomly Compare the Effect of 5-FU Different Administration Methods in This Regimen on the Efficacy and Toxicity

  • 摘要: 目的:评价顺铂-醛氢叶酸/氟脲嘧啶(CDDP-LV/5-FU)疗法对食管癌的疗效.随机比较该疗法中5-FU不同给药方法对食管癌疗效与毒性的影响.方法:122例经病理组织学确诊,可客观评价疗效,接受CDDP-LV/5-FU疗法的初治晚期食管癌患者,随机分为5-FU静脉推注组(A组)与5-FU静脉滴注组(B组),均治疗2~4个周期.结果:总有效率(CR+PR)69.67%(85/122).其中A组有效率76.47%(39/51)高于B组的64.79%(46/71),两组差异有显著性(P<0.05).不良反应A组高于B组(P<0.05),但多为Ⅱ、Ⅲ级,患者均可耐受.结论:CDDP-LV/5-FU疗法对食管癌有较高疗效.此疗法中5-FU静脉推注组的疗效和不良反应高于静脉滴注组.

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of cisplatin (CDDP), Leucovorin (LY) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy in esophageal carcinoma and randomly compare the efficacy and toxicity of 5-FU intravenous injection with continuous intravenous infusion in this regimen. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma objectively evaluated and diagnosed by histopathology, were randomly divided into 5-FU intravenous injection group (A group) and continuous intravenous infusion group (B group). They all have firstly received two to four cycles of CDDP-LY/ 5-FU therapy. Results: The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 69.67%(85/122), and the response rate of A group was 76.47%(39/51), which was higher than that of B group 64.79%(46/71). The difference between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05); the toxicity of A group was higher than that of B group (P<0.05), however, most of them had toxicity of grade " or 瓜,and all were tolerable and reversible. Conclusions: CDDP-LY/5-FU therapy had higher response rate in esophageal carcinoma. The efficacy and toxicity of 5-FU intravenous injection were higher than those of continuous intravenous infusion. It can be concluded that both 5-FU intravenous injection and continuous intravenous infusion in this regimen have reliable response rate in esophageal carcinoma and the intravenous injection is comparatively better.

     

/

返回文章
返回