周岱翰, 林丽珠, 周宜强, 罗荣城, 刘魁凤, 贾英杰, 陈继跃, 牛喜伟, 苏碧茹, 韩慧, 鲁江, 王树堂. 非小细胞肺癌三种治疗方案的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2005, 32(19): 1081-1084.
引用本文: 周岱翰, 林丽珠, 周宜强, 罗荣城, 刘魁凤, 贾英杰, 陈继跃, 牛喜伟, 苏碧茹, 韩慧, 鲁江, 王树堂. 非小细胞肺癌三种治疗方案的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2005, 32(19): 1081-1084.
Zhou Daihan, Lin Lizhu, Zhou Yiqiang, Luo Rongcheng, Liu Kuifeng, Jia Yingjie, Chen Jiyue, Niu Xiwei, Su Biru, Han Hui, Lu Jiang, Wang Shutang. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Regimens for advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 32(19): 1081-1084.
Citation: Zhou Daihan, Lin Lizhu, Zhou Yiqiang, Luo Rongcheng, Liu Kuifeng, Jia Yingjie, Chen Jiyue, Niu Xiwei, Su Biru, Han Hui, Lu Jiang, Wang Shutang. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Regimens for advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 32(19): 1081-1084.

非小细胞肺癌三种治疗方案的成本-效果分析

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Regimens for advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的: 从药物经济学角度研究中医药在提高Ⅲ、Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者生存期中的应用价值,探讨中晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗方案。 方法: 采用前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照的方法,将符合标准病例随机分成中医组、中西医组以及西医组,观察期3个月,以瘤体有效率及稳定率、中位生存期作为效果衡量指标对三种治疗方案进行成本-效果分析。 结果: 共纳入合格病例294例,中医组99例,中西医组103例,西医组92例。三种治疗方案中,中医组的有效率为4.0%,稳定率为66.7%,中位生存期为292天,完成疗程人均费用18682.2元。有效率、稳定率每增加1个百分点成本分别为4624.3元、280.2元;中位生存期每提高1年成本为52.6元。中西医组的有效率为26.2%,稳定率为81.6%,中位生存期为355天,完成疗程人均费用36148.5元。有效率、稳定率每增加1个百分点成本分别为1379.2、443.3元;中位生存期每提高1年成本为101.8元。西医组的有效率为14.1%,稳定率为76.1%,中位生存期为236天,完成疗程人均费用28750.5元。有效率、稳定率每增加1个百分点成本分别为2034.7元、377.8元;中位生存期每提高1年成本为121.8元。 结论: 中医药是中晚期非小细胞肺癌的一种经济、有效的治疗方案。

     

    Abstract: Objective :To study the applicable value of the traditional Chinese medicine, in apoint of view of pharmacoeconomics, for enhancement of survivals of the patients with III一and IVstage non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to investigate the clinical effect of the three therapeuticre mens for advanced NSCLC. Methods :A total of 294 cases of III/IV stage NSCLC patients were randomized into 3 group in 6 clinical centers, i.e. the study group I (TCM only) treated with Chinese herbal decoction, the study group II (TCM+chemotherapy) with herbal decoction and chemotherapy fcisplatin- based regiment), the control group III (chemotherapy only). Data analyses was performed using SPSS for windows Ver10.0 Software. The cost and effectiveness were analyzed. This study was supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (No.2001BA701A15b). Results :Among the regimens, the cost and effectiveness of (overal response rate)ORR was 4624.3, 1379.2 and 2034.7, respectively and that of OSD (overal stable disease) was 280.2,and 377.83. For the median survival time (MS it was 52.6, 101.8 and 121.8, respectively. The analysis of sensitivity has been reported as the results above. Conclusions :Therapy with TCM boasts the most rational both for costs and effectiveness in the treatment. In pharmacoeconomics CCM is a best choice for advanced NSCLC with the long- term therapeutic effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回