廖盛日, 戴莹, 范智慧, 杨薇, 吴薇, 陈敏华. 经直肠超声对直肠癌肠周淋巴结检出率分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2006, 33(19): 1085-1087.
引用本文: 廖盛日, 戴莹, 范智慧, 杨薇, 吴薇, 陈敏华. 经直肠超声对直肠癌肠周淋巴结检出率分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2006, 33(19): 1085-1087.
Liao Sheng-ri, Dai Ying, Fan Zhihui et al, . The Detection Rate of Perirectal Lymph Nodes of Rectal Carcinoma with Transrectal Ultrasonography[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33(19): 1085-1087.
Citation: Liao Sheng-ri, Dai Ying, Fan Zhihui et al, . The Detection Rate of Perirectal Lymph Nodes of Rectal Carcinoma with Transrectal Ultrasonography[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33(19): 1085-1087.

经直肠超声对直肠癌肠周淋巴结检出率分析

The Detection Rate of Perirectal Lymph Nodes of Rectal Carcinoma with Transrectal Ultrasonography

  • 摘要: 目的:总结术前经直肠超声检查(TRUS)对直肠癌肠周淋巴结检出率,分析影响检出率的因素、淋巴结大小与转移的相关性。方法:对45例直肠癌术前行TRUS,记录超声检出的淋巴结数目及大小,对手术切除标本再行术后超声检查,研究病例术前均未行放、化疗。结果:病理检查共检出肠周淋巴结698个,与病理结果比较,术前TRUS对肠周淋巴结总检出率为22.5%,其中最大径(L)<5mm的淋巴结检出率为12.6%,5mm≤L<10mm为42.4%,L≥10mm为67.9%。当肿瘤位于直肠上段或导致肠腔明显狭窄时,TRUS对肠周淋巴结的检出率较低,分别为12.1%、10.3%。病理结果显示,L<5mm的淋巴结转移发生率为13.2%,5~10mm达30.7%,≥10mm达64.3%。结论:TRUS检出的肠周淋巴结数目明显少于病理检查,淋巴结太小、肠腔狭窄,肿瘤位于直肠上段、声像图不典型为影响淋巴结检出率的主要因素,TRUS漏检淋巴结降低了TRUS对肠周淋巴结转移诊断的准确性。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To conclude the preoperative detection rate of perirectal lymph nodes with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and to analyzed factors affecting the detection rate and the correlation between the size and metastasis of the lymph nodes. Methods: Preoperative TRUS was conducted for 45 patients with rectal carcinoma and the size and number of the lymph nodes detected by ultrasonic inspection were recorded. The postoperative sonography was performed again for the surgical specimens. All the results were compared with pathologic findings. Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy was conducted preoperatively in the cases studied. Results: A total of 698 lymph nodes were detected by pathological examinations. In comparison with the pathological findings, the overall preoperative detection rate of the perirectal lymph nodes by the TRUS was 22.5%, among which the detection rate of lymph nodes of less than 5mm in maximum diameter (L) by TRUS was 12.6%, the detection rate of the lymph nodes with the diameter size of larger than or equal to 5 mm and less than 10 mm amounted to 42.4%, and that with the size of larger or equal to 10 mm was 67.9%. The detection rate of TRUS for the perirectal lymph nodes was relatively low as tumor was found at the superior segment of rectum or causing an obvious stenosis of enteric cavity, with 12.1% and 10.3%, respectively. The pathological findings showed that the incidence rate of lymphatic metastasis in the lymph nodes with less than 5 mm was 13.2%, the incidence of metastasis in the lymph nodes with 5 to 10 mm amounted to 30.7% and that in the lymph nodes with larger than or equal to 10 mm was 64.3%. Conclusion: The detection rate of perirectal lymph node with TRUS is low. The following factors may affect the detection rate of lymph nodes with TRUS: size of lymph node, rectal stenosis, tumor location and atypical ultrasonogram. Check failure of the lymph nodes decreases the accuracy of TRUS in the assessment of perirectal lymph node metastasis.

     

/

返回文章
返回