谢德荣, 梁汉霖, 王羽, 郭双双, 杨琼, 江志敏. 吉西他滨联合顺铂与吉西他滨单药化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2006, 33(24): 1424-1427.
引用本文: 谢德荣, 梁汉霖, 王羽, 郭双双, 杨琼, 江志敏. 吉西他滨联合顺铂与吉西他滨单药化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2006, 33(24): 1424-1427.
Xie Derong, Liang Hanlin, Wang Yu, Guo Shuangshuang, Yang Qiong, Jiang Zhimin. A Meta-Analysis of Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin vs. Gemcitabine Alone[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33(24): 1424-1427.
Citation: Xie Derong, Liang Hanlin, Wang Yu, Guo Shuangshuang, Yang Qiong, Jiang Zhimin. A Meta-Analysis of Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin vs. Gemcitabine Alone[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33(24): 1424-1427.

吉西他滨联合顺铂与吉西他滨单药化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌比较的Meta分析

A Meta-Analysis of Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin vs. Gemcitabine Alone

  • 摘要: 目的:通过Meta分析,探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂和吉西他滨单药化疗在治疗晚期胰腺癌的意义。方法:通过MEDLINE、EMBASE、ASCO论文集等数据库检索国内外已发表和未发表的相关文献。选择治疗组为吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗,对照组为吉西他滨单药化疗的晚期胰腺癌随机对照试验(randomizedcontrolledtrial,RCT)。由两位评价者分别按上述检索策略收集资料,按纳入标准入选,主要对总生存率进行Meta分析,其次是客观缓解率和毒副反应。结果:共纳入6个RCT。吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗与吉西他滨单药化疗比较,半年生存率无差别(P=0.24),临床获益反应率无差别(P=0.58),客观缓解率提高6%(P=0.05),半年TTP/TTF提高了9%(P=0.02);同时3/4度毒副反应可能会增加,中性粒细胞减少症增加6%(P=0.08)、血小板减少症增加8%(P=0.17)、恶心/呕吐增加11%(P=0.07),但均无统计学意义。结论:现有证据不推荐吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期胰腺癌,吉西他滨单药化疗仍是目前的标准治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objectives: To compare the administration of gemcitabine (GEM) alone with GEM-cisplatin (DDP) combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage pancreatic cancer (APCa). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and ASCO searches were supplemented with information from data retrievals and registers. A quantitative meta-analysis was carried out using updated information and the inclusion criterion from all available randomized controlled trials. The primary meta-analysis was conducted based on the overall survival rate (OS). The second analysis used objective remission rate (ORR) and toxicity. Results: The meta-analysis included 6 randomized controlled trials. There was no significant improvement in the GEM-DDP combination group for the 6-month survival rate (P=0.24) and the clinical benefit rate (P=0.58). There was a significant improvement in the GEM-DDP combination group in terms of ORR (RD=6%, P=0.05). Moreover, there was a significant improvement in the combination group for 6-month TTP/TTF (RD=9%, P=0.02). However, WHO grade 3-4 toxicity was more frequent for the GEM-DDP combination group along with neutropenia (RD=6%, P=0.08), thrombocytopenia (RD=8%, P=0.17) and vomiting/nausea (RD=11%, P=0.07), but none of these parameters showed a significant difference when compared to the group treated with GEM alone. Conclusion: The regimen of GEM plus DDP had no significant survival benefit compared to GEM alone. GEM-DDP combination should not be recommended as a therapeutic protocol for APCa. Administration of GEMalone is still an optimal treatment for patients with APCa.

     

/

返回文章
返回