熊正平, 张阳德, 梁赵玉, 谢爱民, 何庆, 杨树仁. 肺癌分期的PET/CT表现与血清VEGF表达的关系[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2007, 34(21): 1201-1205.
引用本文: 熊正平, 张阳德, 梁赵玉, 谢爱民, 何庆, 杨树仁. 肺癌分期的PET/CT表现与血清VEGF表达的关系[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2007, 34(21): 1201-1205.
Xiong Zhengping, Zhang Yangde, Liang Zhaoyu, Xie Ainming, He Qing, Yang Shuren. The Relationship between Serum VEGF Expression and PET/CT Manifestations of the TNM-stages of Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 34(21): 1201-1205.
Citation: Xiong Zhengping, Zhang Yangde, Liang Zhaoyu, Xie Ainming, He Qing, Yang Shuren. The Relationship between Serum VEGF Expression and PET/CT Manifestations of the TNM-stages of Lung Cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 34(21): 1201-1205.

肺癌分期的PET/CT表现与血清VEGF表达的关系

The Relationship between Serum VEGF Expression and PET/CT Manifestations of the TNM-stages of Lung Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨肺癌TNM分期的PET/CT成像表现特点与血清VEGF蛋白表达水平的关系。方法:53例肺癌患者治疗前,对其进行PET/CT检查,再用酶联免疫夹心法检测血清VEGF蛋白的表达水平,分析肺癌的T分期和转移(淋巴结和远处转移)的PET/CT表现特征与血清VEGF表达的关系。结果:经PET/CT成像分析,其中T111例、T29例、T318例、T415例;纵隔淋巴结转移22例,9例患者有远处转移。肺癌患者的血清VEGF表达的平均水平为(378.02±180.79)ng/L,与正常健康人组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在不同的低T分期(T1与T2)患者中,血清VEGF表达水平无显著性差异,而低T分期(T1与T2)患者与高T分期(T3与T4)患者中的血清VEGF表达差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。纵隔淋巴结转移组血清VEGF表达水平为(561.50±104.55)ng/L,与非淋巴结转移组间比较差异有统计学意义(t=12.21,P<0.05);远处转移组血清VEGF表达水平为(614.11±158.81)ng/L,血清VEGF的表达明显与远处转移相关(t=5.30,P<0.05)。结论:1)肺癌患者血清VEGF水平呈高表达;2)肺癌患者VEGF的表达水平与发生淋巴结转移和远处转移有关;3)随着肺癌TNM分期增加,血清VEGF蛋白表达增强。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To study the relationship between PET/CT imaging manifestations of the TNM-stages of lung cancer (LC) and the expression of VEGF protein in serum. Methods: Fifty-three LC patients, with PET/CT imaging performed before treatment, were enrolled in this study. The expression of serum VEGF protein was examined by quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA R&D system). A comparison of the PET/CT manifestations of the T-stage and metastasis (lymph nodes and distance) of the lung carcinoma along with the serum VEGF expression was performed. Results: PET/CT imaging manifestations: for T-staging, there were 11 patients staged as T1, 9 as T2, 18 as T3, and 15 as T4. In 22 patients there was mediastinal node metastasis. There were 9 patients with distant metastasis. The expression level of serum VEGF in LC patients was 378.02±180.79 ng/l, significantly different from the level seen in normal patients(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of serum VEGF between T1 and T2 stage cases, while the expression level of serum VEGF was significantly different between lowT-stages(T1, T2) and high T-stages(T3, T4). The expression level of serum VEGF protein of those with mediastinal node metastasis was 561.50±104.55 ng/l, significantly different from that of patients without metastasis (t=12.21, P<0.05). The expression level of serum VEGF of those with distant metastasis was 614.11±158.81 ng/l, significantly different from that of patients without distant metastasis (t=5.30, P<0.05). Conclusion: 1) The level of serum VEGF in LC patients was high. 2) There was a correlation between metastasis(lymph nodes and distance) and the expression level of serum VEGF. 3) With increased TNM-stage, the expression level of serum VEGF protein became higher.

     

/

返回文章
返回