胃肠间质瘤术前靶向治疗后的病理学评估与影像学评估的一致性分析

Consistency analysis between pathological and imaging evaluations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor after preoperative targeted therapy

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨Choi标准及病理学效应对胃肠间质瘤(gastrointestinal stromal tumor, GIST)术前靶向治疗后疗效及预后的评估价值,并观察两者的一致性。
    方法 回顾性分析于昆明医科大学第三附属医院收治37例术前伊马替尼(imatinib,IM)靶向治疗GIST患者的临床病理资料,Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验对Choi标准及病理学效应进行生存分析,Spearman等级相关及Kappa检验分析Choi标准与病理学效应的一致性。
    结果 37例患者术前中位治疗时间为10(2~36)个月。Choi标准评估无完全缓解(complete response,CR)病例,部分缓解(partial response,PR)26例,疾病稳定(stable disease,SD)5例,疾病进展(progressive disease,PD)6例;Choi标准疗效有效组(CR+PR)与无效组(SD+PD)之间总生存期的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。病理学效应评估完全效应1例,高度效应11例,部分效应18例,零级效应7例;病理效应有效组(完全效应+高度效应+部分效应)与无效组(零级效应)之间总生存期的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Choi标准与病理学效应有相关性(r=0.592,P<0.01)及中度一致性(κappa=0.566)。
    结论 Choi标准与病理学效应有中等程度的相关性及一致性,两者均可作为胃肠间质瘤术前靶向治疗疗效评估及预后判断的参考指标,联合应用两者评估具有更高的临床应用价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To assess the efficacy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after preoperative targeted therapy using the Choi criteria compared to pathological effects, and to observe the consistency between them.
    Methods The clinicopathological data of 37 patients, who underwent preoperative treatment with targeted imatinib therapy for GIST, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analysis of the Choi criteria and pathological effects was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. The consistency between the Choi criteria and the pathological effects was assessed using Spearman's correlation and Kappa tests.
    Results The median preoperative treatment duration for the 37 patients was 10 months (range, 2-36 months). According to the Choi criteria, there were no cases of complete response (CR), 26 cases of partial response (PR), five cases of stable disease (SD), and six progressive disease (PD) cases. The difference in overall survival (OS) between the effective group (CR+PR) and the ineffective group (SD+PD) was statistically significant (P<0.01). Pathological effects were evaluated as one complete effect, 11 high effects, 18 partial effects, and seven zero effect cases. The OS significantly differed between the effective (full effect+high effect+partial effect) and ineffective (zero effect) groups was statistically significant (P<0.01). The Choi showed moderate consistency with the pathological effects (r=0.592, P<0.01) with a (κappa=0.566).
    Conclusions The Choi criteria were moderately correlated and consistent with the pathological effects. Both can be used to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of preoperative targeted therapy for GIST. The combined use of these two criteria has better clinical application value than that of either alone.

     

/

返回文章
返回