三类/四类暴露复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床特征及生存分析

Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of patients with triple/quad-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨三类/四类暴露复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤(relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma,RRMM)患者的临床特征与生存预后。
    方法 回顾性分析2017年5月至2024年5月山西省8所医院(山西白求恩医院、山西医科大学第二医院、运城市中心医院、国药同煤总医院、晋城市人民医院、临汾市人民医院、山西省人民医院和运城市人民医院)三类/四类暴露RRMM患者的临床数据,用Kaplan-Meier法分析总生存期(overall survival,OS)和无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),Cox模型及Log-rank检验分析影响因素。
    结果 112例三类暴露患者中16例为四类暴露。三类暴露患者高风险细胞遗传学异常及髓外病变的检出率分别为57.1%和36.6%,四类暴露患者分别为87.5%和62.5%;三类暴露患者的中位PFS和OS分别为5.6个月和12.2个月,四类暴露患者分别为9.4个月和16.9个月。Cox模型分析显示,髓外病变、多线治疗(≥3线)是影响三类暴露RRMM患者生存的独立危险因素(P<0.05);既往自体干细胞移植、后续常规药物治疗及B细胞成熟抗原(B-cell maturation antigen,BCMA)的嵌合抗原受体T细胞(chimeric antigen receptor T,CAR-T)治疗为保护因素(P<0.05)。三类耐药后,Log-rank检验证实BCMA CAR-T治疗较常规药物治疗显著延长患者中位PFS(9.4个月vs. 5.2个月)(P=0.026 9),但OS差异无统计学意义(16.9个月vs. 7.9个月)(P=0.263 4)。
    结论 三类/四类暴露RRMM患者预后差,BCMA CAR-T细胞治疗可改善三类耐药RRMM患者生存期。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and survival prognosis of patients with triple/quad-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
    Methods  The clinical data of patients with triple/quad-class exposed RRMM from eight centers in Shanxi Province between May 2017 and May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors affecting survival were examined by the Cox proportional hazards model and Log-rank test.
    Results Among the 112 patients with triple-class exposure, 16 were quadruple-class exposed. The detection rates of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and extramedullary lesions in patients with triple-class exposure were 57.1% and 36.6%, respectively, while those in patients with quadruple-class exposure were 87.5% and 62.5%, respectively. The median PFS and OS of patients with triple-class exposure were 5.6 months and 12.2 months, respectively, while those of patients with quadruple-class exposure were 9.4 months and 16.9 months, respectively. Cox model analysis showed that extramedullary lesions and multi-line treatment (≥3 lines) were independent risk factors for the survival of patients with triple-class exposed RRMM (P<0.05). Previous autologous stem cell transplantation, subsequent conventional drug treatment, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment were protective factors (P<0.05). After triple-class drug resistance, the Log-rank test verified that BCMA CAR-T treatment significantly prolonged the median PFS of patients compared to conventional drug treatment (9.4 months vs. 5.2 months, P=0.026 9), whereas the difference in OS was not statistically significant (16.9 months vs. 7.9 months, P=0.263 4).
    Conclusions Patients with triple/quad-class exposed RRMM have a poor prognosis, and BCMA CAR-T cell therapy can improve survival in patients with triple-class drug-resistant RRMM.

     

/

返回文章
返回