IBUCy或FABC预处理方案用于中高危急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植的疗效与安全性比较

Comparison of IBUCy and FABC conditioning regimens followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in medium-to-high risk acute myelocytic leukemia: an analysis of efficacy and safety

  • 摘要:
    目的 评价伊达比星+白消安+环磷酰胺(IBUCy)方案或氟达拉滨+阿糖胞苷+白消安+环磷酰胺(FABC)方案预处理在异基因造血干细胞移植(allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,allo-HSCT)治疗中高危急性髓系白血病(acute myelogenous leukemia,AML)的疗效与安全性。
    方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年12月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院接受上述两种方案预处理后行allo-HSCT的49例中高危AML患者资料,其中IBUCy组17例,FABC组32例,通过对比造血重建、不良反应以及生存情况评价两种方案的疗效与安全性,并进行了预后相关因素分析。
    结果 所有患者造血重建,两组的造血时间、5年无进展生存率(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存率(oversall survival,OS)相似。虽然IBUCy组≥3级口腔黏膜炎、恶心呕吐、腹泻的发生率及慢性移植物抗宿主病(graft-versus-host disease,GVHD)的发生率更高,但出血性膀胱炎的发生率更低。确诊到首次移植时间>6个月(P=0.019)和移植前微小残留病灶(minimal residual disease,MRD)阳性(P=0.048)是PFS的危险因素。在移植前MRD阴性的患者中,IBUCy组PFS更好(P=0.039)。
    结论 中高危AML接受IBUCy或FABC预处理后行allo-HSCT是安全有效的,此类患者获得首次缓解后应尽快移植,MRD转阴者移植PFS更好;与FABC方案相比,IBUCy方案具有一定优势,但应注意防治消化道不良反应及慢性GVHD。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IBUCy (idarubicin, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide) and FABC (fludarabine, cytarabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide) conditioning regimens followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for the treatment of medium-to-high risk acute myelocytic leukemia (AML).
    Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 49 patients with medium-to-high risk AML who received IBUCy (n=17) or FABC (n=32) conditioning regimens followed by allo-HSCT between January 2015 and December 2021 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Hematopoietic reconstruction time, adverse events, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups to assess the efficacy and safety of the two regimens. Additionally, we analyzed factors that may be associated with prognosis.
    Results Hematopoietic reconstruction was successful in all 49 patients. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of hematopoietic reconstruction time. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between the two groups. The incidence rates of oral mucositis, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea (≥grade 3 based on CTCAE v5.0), and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were significantly higher in the IBUCy group than that in the FABC group. However, the incidence rate of hemorrhagic cystitis in the FABC group was significantly higher than that in the IBUCy group. The time from diagnosis to allo-HSCT >6 months and being minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive before transplantation were identified as the risk factors for PFS (P=0.019 and P=0.048, respectively). Patients who were MRD-negative before transplantation had significantly longer PFS when treated with the IBUCy conditioning regimen (P=0.039).
    Conclusions Both IBUCy and FABC conditioning regimens prior to allo-HSCT are safe and effective for treating medium-to-high risk AML. Allo-HSCT should be performed as soon as possible when patients achieve their first complete remission. Patients with an MRD-negative status before transplantation tend to have longer PFS. Compared with the FABC regimen, the IBUCy regimen has some advantages; however, attention should be given to the prevention and management of gastrointestinal adverse events and chronic GVHD.

     

/

返回文章
返回