维奈克拉长疗程方案治疗急性髓系白血病的生存分析及影响因素

Survival analysis and prognostic factors of a long-course venetoclax-based regimen in acute myeloid leukemia

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨维奈克拉为基础(venetoclax based,VEN-based)的方案长疗程治疗初治急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia,AML)(非M3型)的生存及影响因素,为AML的维持治疗提供依据。
    方法 回顾性分析2021年5月至2024年1月在南昌大学第一附属医院接受至少4个疗程VEN-based方案治疗的初治AML患者资料,分析其复合完全缓解率(composite complete response rate,cCR)、微小残留病(minimal residual disease,MRD)的阴性率、总生存时间(overall survival,OS)、无复发生存时间(relapse-free survival,RFS)及不良反应发生情况。
    结果 本研究共纳入30例初治AML患者,中位年龄65(53~78)岁,中位治疗7(4~20)个疗程。1个疗程治疗后cCR和MRD阴性率分别为80.0%和63.3%。累积cCR为96.7%,MRD阴性率为80.0%。中位随访21.3(95%CI:14.7~27.9)个月,中位OS为32.3个月,中位RFS未达到,2年OS率和RFS率分别为70.6%和54.8%。单因素分析提示2017版欧洲白血病网(ELN)危险度分层预后不良及复发影响RFS及OS(P<0.05),多因素分析未提示上述因素与生存率有关(P>0.05)。安全性方面以血液学不良反应最为常见,其次为感染,总体耐受性良好。
    结论 VEN-based方案长疗程治疗AML患者疗效确切且安全性好,50%以上患者可获2年以上生存。VEN-based方案可作为AML患者有效维持治疗选择。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the survival and prognostic factors of a long-course venetoclax-based (VEN-based) regimen in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and provide evidence for the maintenance treatment of AML.
    Methods A retrospective study was conducted in patients who received a VEN-based regimen and completed at least four courses of efficacy evaluation at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2021 to January 2024. The composite complete response rate (cCR), minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate, overall survival (OS) time, relapse-free survival (RFS) time, and adverse events were analyzed.
    Results Overall, 30 newly diagnosed patients with AML were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 (range, 53–78) years, and the median number of treatment cycles was 7 (range, 4–20) years. After one cycle, the CR-and MRD-negative rates were 80.0% and 63.3%, respectively. The cumulative cCR was 96.7%, and MRD negative rate was 80.0%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 21.3 (95% confidence intervals 14.7–27.9) months. The median OS time was 32.3 months and RFS time was not reached. The 2-year OS and RFS rates were 70.6% and 54.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis suggested that ELN2017 risk stratification and relapse status affected RFS and OS (P<0.05). However, the multivariate analysis failed to reveal any relationship between these factors and survival (P>0.05). In terms of safety, hematological adverse events were the most common, followed by infections. Overall, the VEN-based regimen was tolerated for patients with AML.
    Conclusions A long-course VEN-based regimen is effective and safe. More than half of patients survive for >2 years, and it can be used as an effective maintenance treatment option for patients with AML.

     

/

返回文章
返回