基于计算病理学的肿瘤微环境评分预测EGFR突变阳性非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR-TKIs疗效

Computational pathology-based tumor microenvironment score for predictingEGFR-TKIs efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨基于全视野数字切片图像(whole slide images, WSIs)计算病理学的肿瘤微环境(tumor microenvironment, TME)评分预测表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)突变阳性非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者行表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors,EGFR-TKIs)治疗的疗效。
    方法 回顾性分析2015年4月至2025年2月于皖南医学院第一附属医院确诊的240例EGFR突变且行EGFR-TKIs治疗NSCLC患者穿刺活检的苏木精-伊红染色(hematoxylin-eosin staining, H&E)病灶WSIs及临床、影像资料。按照2∶1比例随机分成训练集(n=160)和独立验证集(n= 80)。根据EGFR-TKIs治疗3个月后的CT扫描结果判断疗效。使用计算病理学自动定量WSIs肿瘤区域内4种TME成分(肿瘤上皮、间质、淋巴及血管)的比例。基于训练集的多因素Logistic回归筛选出对疗效具有独立预测价值的TME成分(P<0.05),并构建TME评分(tumor microenvironment score,TME-score)。使用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)及曲线下面积(AUC)评价预测效能。并与临床特征构建的模型及组合模型(TME-score+临床特征)进行比较。最后在独立数据集进行验证。
    结果 在训练集中,包括上皮及间质比例构建的TME-score的疗效预测的AUC为0.827(95%CI:0.749~0.892),验证集AUC=0.845(95%CI:0.735~0.937),均优于临床模型AUC分别为0.730(95%CI:0.645~0.804)和0.712(95%CI:0.586~0.824)。联合TME-score与临床特征(细胞角蛋白19片段、平扫CT值)后模型效能进一步提升AUC分别为0.884(95%CI:0.827~0.932)和0.882(95%CI:0.798~0.950)。3个模型两两比较的Delong检验显示除了验证集中TME-score与组合模型的P=0.289,其余均P<0.05。
    结论 TME-score在EGFR突变阳性NSCLC患者EGFR-TKIs疗效预测方面优于临床模型,可作为筛选靶向治疗获益患者的新方法。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the utility of a computational pathology-based tumor microenvironment (TME) score derived from whole slide images (WSIs) in predicting the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Methods This retrospective study collected 240 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College and analyzed hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained WSIs of biopsy specimens, along with clinical and imaging data. The patients were randomly assigned into a training cohort (n=160) and an independent validation cohort (n=80) in a 2:1 ratio. Treatment response was assessed based on CT findings at 3 months after EGFR-TKIs initiation. Computational pathology was employed to automatically quantify the proportions of four TME components (tumor epithelium, stroma, lymphocytes, and vasculature) within the tumor regions of WSIs. Multivariate Logistic regression in the training cohort identified TME components independently predictive of treatment response (P<0.05), which were then integrated into a TME-score. The predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC). The TME-score model was compared with a clinical-feature-based model and a combined model (TME-score+clinical features). Finally, the models were validated in the independent cohort.
    Results In the training cohort, the TME-score, incorporating epithelial and stromal proportions, achieved an AUC of 0.827 (95%CI: 0.749–0.892) for predicting treatment response, while the validation cohort yielded an AUC of 0.845 (95%CI: 0.735–0.937). Both outperformed the clinical model (AUCs=0.730 95%CI: 0.645–0.804 and 0.712 95%CI: 0.586–0.824, respectively). The combined model (TME-score+clinical features, including cytokeratin 19 fragment and non-contrast CT values) further improved predictive performance (AUCs=0.884 95%CI: 0.827–0.932 and 0.882 95%CI: 0.798–0.950, respectively). Delong’s test for pairwise model comparisons showed significant differences (all P<0.05) except TME-score and the combined model in the validation cohort (P=0.289).
    Conclusions TME-score outperformed clinical models in predicting EGFR-TKIs efficacy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients and may serve as a novel tool for identifying patients likely to benefit from targeted therapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回