胸段食管癌淋巴结转移规律及其影响因素*

The Pattern o fLymphatic Metastasis and Influencing Factors of Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨胸段食管癌淋巴结转移规律及其影响因素。方法:选择行根治性手术切除、胸腹二野淋巴结清扫术的229 例胸段食管癌进行研究,手术共清扫淋巴结2 458 枚。分析食管癌不同病变部位淋巴结转移度分布情况以及肿瘤浸润深度、病变长度、大体病理形态、肿瘤分化程度等因素对淋巴结转移的影响。结果:1)102 例食管癌发生淋巴结转移,淋巴结转移率为44.5%(102/229)。 258 枚淋巴结发生转移,淋巴结转移度为10.5%(258/2 458)。2)胸上段食管癌上纵隔、中纵隔、下纵隔和腹腔淋巴结转移度分别为19.0% 、6.7% 、9.8% 和14.2% ;胸中段食管癌分别为26.1% 、7.4% 、11.8% 和11.9% ;胸下段食管癌分别为0、1.6% 、5.3% 和10.0% 。3)Tis期无淋巴结转移。T1、T2、T3、T4 期淋巴结转移率分别为28.6% 、42.9% 、48.3% 和31.3% ;淋巴结转移度分别为7.9% 、10.8% 、10.7% 和10.8% ;T1~T4 期淋巴结转移率和转移度组间比较均无显著性差异(χ2=2.733,P=0.435 和χ2=0.686,P=0.876)。 4)病变长度≤3cm组、
    3~5cm组和>5cm组淋巴结转移率分别为45.2% 、43.4% 和46.2% ,淋巴结转移度分别为9.1% 、11.6% 和11.7% ,组间比较差异均不显著(χ2=0.094,P=0.954 和χ2=3.933,P=0.140)。 5)髓质型、溃疡型、蕈伞型和缩窄型食管癌淋巴结转移度分别为14.0% 、9.6% 、4.3% 和18.3%(χ2=19.292,P=0.000),蕈伞型食管癌淋巴结转移度较低。6)鳞癌、低分化鳞癌淋巴结转移率为42.5% 和75.0%(χ2=4.852,P=0.028);淋巴结转移度为9.5% 和18.6%(χ2=11.323,P=0.001)。 低分化者易发生淋巴结转移。结论:胸段食管癌淋巴结转移涉及部位多,播散广泛,且食管癌病变早期即可发生癌转移。大体病理形态及肿瘤分化程度是影响淋巴结转移的主要因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To explore the pattern of lymphatic metastasis and influencing factors of thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Methods:We reviewed the pathological specimens from 229 esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. A total of 2,458 lymph nodes were dissected. We analyzed the lymph node metastasis pattern of the primary tumor in different loca-tions and the corresponding influencing factors such as pathological T stage, tumor length, pathological mor -phology and tumor differentiation. Results: Lymph node metastasis rates were44.5% (102 /229 ) and 10.5% (258 /2458), respectively. For patients with upper thoracic esophageal carcinomas, lymphatic metastasis rates in the superior mediastinum, the middle mediastinum, the inferior mediastinum and the abdominal cavity were 19.0% ,6.7% ,9.8% and 12.2% , respectively. For patients with middle thoracic esophageal carcinomas, the rates were 26.1%,7.4% ,11.8% and 11.9%, respectively. For patietns with lower thoracic esophageal carcino-mas, the rates were 0, 1.6%,5.3%, and10.0%, respectively. Lymphatic metastasis rate in T1, T2, T3, T4 stage cancer were 28.6% ,43.8% ,47.6% , and31.3% , respectively; the rate of positive lymph nodes were 7.9% ,10.8%,10.7%, and10.8%, respectively, with no significant differences among the four stages ( χ2=2.733 , P=0.435 and χ2=0.686 , P=0.876 ). Lymphatic metastasis rate and rate of positive lymph nodes in patients with tu -mor ≤3cm, 3 to 5cm, and >5cm were 45.2% and 43.4%,46.2% and 9.1%, and11.6% and 11.7%, respective-ly, with no significant differences ( χ2=0.094 , P=0.954 and χ2=3.933 , P=0.140 ). Lymphatic metastasis ratios of the pathological morphology in medullary, ulcerative, mushroom and stenotic types were 14.0%,9.6%,4.3%and 18.3%, respectively (χ2=19.292 , P=0.000 ). Lymphatic metastasis rate and rate of positive lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinoma of moderately and poorly differentiation were 42.5%,75.0% and 9.5%,18.6%, re-spectively (χ2=4.852 , P=0.028 and χ2=11.323 , P=0.001 ). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of poorly differentiation had a higher rate of lymph node metastasis. Conclusion:Lymphatic metastasis of esophageal car -cinoma metastasize widely even if in early T stage. Pathological morphology and tumor differentiation are re -lating facors of lymph node metastasis of thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回