图像融合技术在肺癌患者定位误差分析中应用初探

Preliminary Investigation on Application of Image Fusion in Error Analysis during Simulation for Lung Cancer Patients

  • 摘要: 目的:应用图像融合技术比较肺癌患者三维放疗计划几何中心与经校对后中心的误差,明确误差方向,验证误差范围,提高放疗精度。方法:采用 Phlipis 16 排大孔径螺旋CT定位机对 30 例已行体膜固定的肺癌患者进行定位扫描,将图像传输入Eclipse 7.0三维治疗计划系统并设计放射治疗计划,确定几何中心后在 CT模拟机下校对中心并参照校对后中心进行图像扫描,传输图像进入Eclipse 7.0 三维治疗计划系统,应用图像融合技术对校对中心前后图像进行融合,比较两个图像中心点位置在三维方向上的误差并进行分析。结果:X 方向准确度为2.20 mm,X 方向精度为1.20 mm,平均误差2.20 ±1.20 mm;Y 方向准确度为2.36 mm,Y 方向精度为1.36 mm,平均误差2.30 ±1.95 mm;Z 方向准确度为3.12 mm,Z 方向精度为1.78 mm,平均误差3.50 ±3.48 mm;总的准确度为4.99 mm,精度为 1.34 mm。3 个方向平均误差间的差异采用多组比较的秩和检验分析有统计学意义(χ2=6.773,P=0.034)。结论:肺癌患者在定位阶段的误差在可接受范围内;三维方向误差主要来源于头脚方向。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To compare the errors of geometric center of the conformal radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer, before and after the proofreading of the three-dimensional (3D) directions by CT simulation localizer, us-ing the image fusion technology, and to clearly identify the direction of the errors and verify the range of the errors, so as to improve the precision of radiotherapy. Methods:Philips 16-row big pore diameter spiral CT simulator exclusively for radio -therapy planning was used for a scout view in 30lung cancer patients with thermo-plastic (body mask) phantom immobiliza -tion. In each of the patients, a set of images was transmitted to a three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system (3-D TPS, Eclipse7.0), then the radio-therapeutic plan was devised with an ascertainment of the geometric center. The cen-ter was proofread by the CT simulator to get a corrected center which was marked on the body. A rescan was performed ac -cording to the site of corrected center, and the new image was also transmitted to the 3-D TPS, with the correct center. The image fusion technology was used to check and analyze the errors of the 2 centers in 3D directions. Results: The average accuracy and precision in the X direction were 2.20mm and 1.20mm, respectively, with the mean error of2.20± 1.20mm, while the accuracy and precision were2.36mm and 1.36mm, respectively, in the Y direction, with the mean error of2.30±1.95mm. These values were 3.12mm and 1.78mm, respectively, in the Z direction, with the mean error of 3.50± 3.48mm. The overall accuracy and precision were respectively 4.99mm and 1.34mm in the directions. There was statistical signifi-cance in comparison of the differences in the mean errors of the 3 directions, using the rank sum test for an inter-group comparison ( χ2=6.773 , P=0.034 ). Conclusion:In the patients with lung cancer, the error of radiation treatment planning cen-ter during simulation is in the acceptable limit. The main source of the errors in the 3D directions is in the cephalic and pedalian directions.

     

/

返回文章
返回