氟达拉滨联合表柔比星治疗复发难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤

Fludarabine Combined with Epirubicin Second-line Chemotherapy for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨FE(氟达拉滨联合表柔比星)方案作为二线解救方案治疗复发难治性的惰性淋巴瘤(Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma ,NHL )的有效性和安全性。方法:经组织病理学证实的复发难治性惰性NHL 79例,按信封法随机分为FE方案组与FMD方案组。39例采用FE方案化疗(氟达拉滨25mg/m2/d ,d1~d3;表柔比星(EPI)60mg/m2/d ,d1,28天为1 周期),40例采用FMD方案化疗(氟达拉滨25mg/m2/d ,d1~d3;米托蒽醌10mg/m2/d ,d1;地塞米松20mg/d ,d1~d5,28d 为1 周期)。 所有患者均至少完成2 个周期化疗。结果:FE组有效率(CR+PR)64.1% ,临床受益率(CR+PR+SD )79.5% ,中位无进展生存期21个月,2 年总生存率71.8% ;FMD组有效率(CR+PR)57.5% ,临床受益率(CR+PR+SD )75% ,中位无进展生存期20个月,2 年总生存率60% 。FE组的疗效略优于FMD组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 中位无进展生存期和2 年总生存率两组间亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 两组不良反应均以中性粒细胞减少和感染最为常见,其中Ⅲ~Ⅳ度骨髓抑制FE组15.4%(6/39),FMD组29%(15/40),经升血治疗处理恢复;肺感染FE组5.1%(2/39),FMD组22.5%(9/40)。 FE组Ⅲ~Ⅳ度中性粒细胞缺乏和肺感染发生率均较FMD组轻,两组不良反应发生率间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。 结论:FE方案治疗复发难治性惰性NHL 的疗效肯定,骨髓毒性和肺感染发生率明显低于FMD组,是复发难治性惰性NHL 患者安全有效的解救方案,值得进一步推广应用。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Fludarabine and Epirubicin (FE) regimen in the treatment of refractory or relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin ’s lymphoma (NHL). Methods:A total of79patients with histopathologically verified relapsed or refractory indolent NHL were randomly assigned to be treated with FE regimen (Fludarabine 25mg/m2×3, d1~d3; Epirubicin 60mg/m2, d1, one cycle for 28days) or FMD regimen (Fludarabine 25mg/m2× 3, d1~d3; Noventrone 10mg/m2, d1; Dexamethasone 20mg/d, d1~d5). All patients received treatment for about 2 cycles.Results: The response rate, clinical benefit response, median progression-free survival and 2-year survival rates in the two groups were64.1% vs. 57.5%,79.5% vs.75%,21months vs. 20months, and 71.8% vs.60%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall response rate or the 2-year overall survival rate between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). The main side ef -fects were leucopenia and infection. The incidence of Ⅲ~Ⅳmyelosuppression was15.4% vs. 29% in the FE and FMD groups; symptoms of infection occurred in 5.1% vs.22.5% of the FE and FMD groups, respectively. The incidence ofⅢ~Ⅳleucopenia and pneumonia in the FE group was slightly lower than in the FMD group, and the difference had statistical significance ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The efficacy of the FE regimen was as good as that of the FMD regimen, but the FE group had a lower incidence of Ⅲ~Ⅳleucopenia and pneumonia than the FMD group. Thus the FE regimen is a promis -ing and effective second-line salvage regimen for the treatment of relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin ’s lympho-ma, worthy of wider use.

     

/

返回文章
返回