内镜下球囊扩张术在胆管癌细胞刷检中的应用价值

The value of endoscopic balloon dilatation in cholangiocarcinoma brush cytology

  • 摘要:
      目的  探索内镜下球囊扩张术联合胆道细胞刷检应用于胆管癌的诊断价值。
      方法  单中心前瞻性研究2018年1月至2020年1月华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉中心医院经影像学(CT或MRI)提示胆管恶性狭窄可能或原因不明胆管狭窄并同意逆行胰胆管造影(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)诊治的患者临床资料及随访情况。所纳入研究患者均行内镜下胆管狭窄球囊扩张术,并于球囊扩张前后分别进行细胞刷检术,扩张前后留取病理设为对照组及试验组。若有癌细胞或显著异形细胞发现提示刷检阳性,若未见癌细胞或异形细胞则提示刷检阴性。阴性患者中结合临床仍高度考虑胆管癌同意手术且术后证实胆管癌者或者难以判断胆管癌的患者经随访2个月有进展者均考虑刷检假阴性。应用优势性检验(McNemar检验)分析两种诊断方法之间是否存在显著性差异。
      结果  共纳入符合条件的研究病例39例,其中男性26例,女性13例,平均年龄(68.0± 5.2)岁。经细胞学检测、手术病理及临床随访最终明确诊断胆管癌35例。对照组刷检阳性17例,细胞刷检灵敏度48.6%(17/35),试验组刷检阳性26例,细胞刷检灵敏度74.2%(26/35)。另外有2例患者对照组刷检阳性,试验组刷检阴性。合计对照组及试验组刷检阳性共28例,细胞刷检灵敏度80.0%(28/35),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
      结论  内镜下球囊扩张术联合细胞刷检可提高胆管癌的病理诊断灵敏度,球囊扩张前后分别进行细胞刷检可提高诊断灵敏度,且操作比较简单,值得临床推广。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the value of endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with endoscopic biliary brushings in the diagno-sis of bile duct strictures.
      Methods  A prospective single center study was conducted to summarize the clinical and follow-up data of patients with malignant biliary stricture who were confirmed by CT or MRI during January 2018 to January 2020. All of them were informed consent to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure. All the patients were treated with endoscopic balloon dilatation of bile duct stricture. Before and after dilation, pathological samples were taken as control group and experimental group. All the pathological diagnosis was made by the same two senior pathologists after reading and discussing the results of cytology. If there are cancer cells or significant heterogenous cells, it indicates that the brush test is positive. Otherwise, it is negative. Among the negative patients, those who still highly considered cholangiocarcinoma and agreed to surgery and confirmed cholangiocarcinoma after surgery or who were difficult to be diagnosed as cholangiocarcinoma progressed after 2 months of follow-up were considered as false negative. The advantage test (McNemar test) was used to analyze the difference between the two diagnostic methods.
      Results  A total of 39 cases were included, 26 males and 13 females, with an average age of (68.0±5.2) years. 35 cases of cholangiocarcinoma were considered by pathology, surgery or 2 months-follow-ups. In the control group, 17 cases were brush positive, and the sensitivity rate was 48.6% (17/35). In the experimental group, 26 cases were brush positive, and the sensitivity rate was 74.2% (26/35). In addition, 2 patients in the control group were brush positive, while in the experimental group, brush negative. A total of 28 cases were positive in the two groups. The sensitivity rate of cell brush test was 80.0% (28/35). There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions  Endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with endoscopic biliary brushings can improve the sensitivity of pathological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, and endoscopic biliary brushings before and after balloon dilatation can improve the sensitivity of diagnosis, and the procedure is relatively easy to master and worth spreading in clinical works.

     

/

返回文章
返回