细胞凋亡与Fas的表达在中晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗中的意义

Apoptosis and Expression of Apoptosis-associated Fas Protein during Synchronal Radiochemotherapy for Advanced Uterine Cervix Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 :通过探讨细胞凋亡及Fas的表达,讨论中晚期宫颈癌放疗敏感性的机制,从而为宫颈癌的个体化、优化治疗提供理论依据。 方法 :选取新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院2006年1月~2007年6月间60例中晚期宫颈癌患者,随机分为2组,单纯放疗(radiotherapy,RT)组30例给予10Gy放疗前、后取活检,放化疗(synchronal radiochemotherapy,CRT)组30例先行一次化疗再给予10Gy放疗前、后取活检,采用免疫组织化学法和脱氧核糖核酸转移酶介导的缺口末端标记(TUNEL)技术,分别检测30例单纯放疗和30例放化疗联合宫颈癌患者治疗前、后宫颈肿瘤细胞凋亡率及Fas蛋白的表达。 结果 :RT组和CRT组完全缓解率分别为50%和90%(P=0.0012)。在治疗过程中,RT组和CRT组凋亡阳性率均增加,分别由33.33%上升到66.67%(P=0.02)和36.67%增加到93.33%(P=0.000),差异显著,治疗中CRT组较RT组增加更加明显(P=0.02)。Fas的表达亦增加,分别由33.33%上升到70.0%(P=0.01)和26.67%增加到76.67%,差异显著(P=0.000),但两组间Fas的表达阳性率无差异(P>0.05)。两组在治疗中,凋亡的阳性率和Fas的阳性表达密切相关,CRT组较RT组相关性更强(P=0.015,r=0.755;P=0.027,r=0.423)。 结论 :中晚期宫颈鳞癌CRT比RT有更好的缓解率,其机制可能是化疗和放疗有协同作用,通过上调Fas蛋白诱导了肿瘤细胞的凋亡。

     

    Abstract: Objective : To investigate the molecular mechanism of cell death after radiotherapy or radiochemotherapyfor advanced uterine cervix cancer (UCC) and to discuss the apoptosis and expression of Fas protein. Methods : A total of 60 patients with UCC were randomly divided into two groups: the radiotherapy (RT) group with30 patients who received simple external irradiation of the pelvic cavity and after-loading therapy, and the synchronal radiochemotherapy (CRT) group with 30 patients who received one cycle of chemotherapy besidesRT. Biopsy of the UCC was conducted before and during the treatment (group RT: after 10 Gy radiotherapy;group CRT: 10 Gy radiotherapy + chemotherapy for one cycle). The samples obtained in the treatment weredetected to determine apoptosis and the expression of Fas protein using TUNEL and immunohistochemistry. Results : The complete response rate was 50% in the RT group and 90% in the CRT group, respectively (P=0.0012). Before and during the treatment, the positive rates of apoptosis were increased, ranging from33.33% to 66.67% (P=0.02) in the RT group and from 36.67% to 93.33% (P=0.000) in the CRT group, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups, especially during the treatment (P=0.02).The positive rate of Fas protein was 33.33% before treatment and 70% after treatment in the RT group. In theCRT group, the positive rate of Fas protein was 26.67% before treatment and 76.67% after treatment. However, there was no change in the expression of Fas in both groups (P>0.05). There was a significant correlationbetween the expression of Fas and apoptosis after treatment in both groups (P=0.015, r=0.755 vs P=0.027, r=0.423). Conclusion : For UCC, CRT can achieve a better remission rate than RT. An additive or synergistic an-ti-cancer effect may be the mechanism of CRT, which is reflected by up-regulating Fas pathway for inductionof tumor cell apoptosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回