闵婕, 李心心, 王欣. 新辅助化疗联合双靶治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性比较[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(22): 1142-1146. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20231078
引用本文: 闵婕, 李心心, 王欣. 新辅助化疗联合双靶治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性比较[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(22): 1142-1146. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20231078
Jie Min, Xinxin Li, Xin Wang. Efficacy comparation of different neoadjuvant chemotherapies combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER-2 positive breast cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(22): 1142-1146. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20231078
Citation: Jie Min, Xinxin Li, Xin Wang. Efficacy comparation of different neoadjuvant chemotherapies combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER-2 positive breast cancer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 50(22): 1142-1146. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20231078

新辅助化疗联合双靶治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性比较

Efficacy comparation of different neoadjuvant chemotherapies combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER-2 positive breast cancer

  • 摘要:
      目的  比较多西他赛+卡铂+曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗(TCbHP)、多西他赛+曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗(THP)与蒽环类+环磷酰胺序贯紫杉类+曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗(AC-THP)作为新辅助治疗方案对HER-2阳性激素受体(hormone receptor,HR)阳性和HER-2阳性HR阴性乳腺癌患者的有效性。
      方法  回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年12月于天津医科大学肿瘤医院就诊的408例HER-2阳性且行标准新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,根据HR状态分为HER-2阳性HR阳性组 211例、HER-2阳性HR阴性组197例。根据不同新辅助治疗方案进一步分为TCbHP、THP和AC-THP组,分别比较各组患者行各治疗方案的病理学完全缓解(pathological complete response,pCR)率 。
      结果  HER-2阳性HR阳性乳腺癌患者中,TCbHP、THP和AC-THP组的pCR率分别为43.1%(69/160)、36.0%(9/25)和 38.5%(10/26),各组间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.580,P=0.748);HER-2阳性HR阴性患者中,TCbHP、THP和AC-THP组的pCR率分别为85.5%(94/110)、57.3%(43/75) 和 66.7%(8/12),TCbHP组与THP组比较差异具有统计学意义(χ2=19.967,P<0.001)。
      结论  TCbHP、THP和AC-THP新辅助治疗方案对HER-2阳性HR阳性乳腺癌患者的疗效相似,TCbHP作为新辅助治疗对HER-2阳性HR阴性乳腺癌疗效更优。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the efficacy of taxane + carboplatin combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TCbHP), taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) and anthracycline + cyclophosphamide followed by taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (AC-THP) as neoadjuvant therapy strategies for breast cancer patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) positive hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER-2 positive HR negative cancers, respectively.
      Methods  We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data of 408 HER-2 positive breast cancer patients receiving standard neoadjuvant therapy from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital from June 2019 to December 2022. Stratified by HR, 211 of 408 were HER-2 positive HR positive, and 197 of 408 were HER-2 positive HR negative. Participants were further assigned into a TCbHP group, a THP group, and an AC-THP group according to their differing neoadjuvant regimens, and their pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were compared.
      Results  Among the HER-2 positive HR positive patients, the respective pCR rates of the TCbHP, THP, and AC-THP groups were 43.1% (69/160), 36.0% (9/25), and 38.5% (10/26) with no statistical significance (χ2=0.580, P=0.748). Among the HER-2 positive HR negative patients, the respective pCR rates of the TCbHP, THP, and AC-THP groups were 85.5% (94/110), 57.3% (43/75), and 66.7% (8/12) with a statistically significant difference between the TCbHP and THP groups (χ2=19.967, P<0.001).
      Conclusions  TCbHP, THP, and AC-THP as neoadjuvant regimens exerted similar efficacy in treating HER-2 positive HR positive breast cancer. TCbHP exhibited superior efficacy in HER-2 positive HR negative breast cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回