姬忠贺①, 孙建华①, 武海涛①, 张倩①, 彭开文①, 李雁①②. 腹腔热灌注化疗对腹腔游离癌细胞杀灭效果的评价*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 42(19): 963-968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2015.17.848
引用本文: 姬忠贺①, 孙建华①, 武海涛①, 张倩①, 彭开文①, 李雁①②. 腹腔热灌注化疗对腹腔游离癌细胞杀灭效果的评价*[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 42(19): 963-968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2015.17.848
Zhonghe JI1, Jianhua SUN1, Haitao WU1, Qian ZHANG1, Kaiwen PENG1, Yan LI1. Assessment of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the eradication of intraperitoneal free cancer cells[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 42(19): 963-968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2015.17.848
Citation: Zhonghe JI1, Jianhua SUN1, Haitao WU1, Qian ZHANG1, Kaiwen PENG1, Yan LI1. Assessment of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the eradication of intraperitoneal free cancer cells[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 42(19): 963-968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2015.17.848

腹腔热灌注化疗对腹腔游离癌细胞杀灭效果的评价*

Assessment of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the eradication of intraperitoneal free cancer cells

  • 摘要: 目的:评估腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy ,HIPEC)对腹腔游离癌细胞的杀灭作用,探索腹膜癌细胞学根治的可行性。方法:收集 45例腹膜转移癌患者 HIPEC 前、后的腹腔灌洗液(或腹水)样本,分别行腹腔灌洗液细胞学(periton eal lavage cytology ,PLC )检查;普通RT-PCR 及实时定量RT-PCR 检测CEA mRNA 、CK20mRNA ;化学发光法检测HIPEC 前、后患者血清肿瘤标志物CEA 、CA125 、CA19- 9 ;分析各项指标HIPEC 前、后的变化特点。结果:HIPEC 前、后PLC 检查阳性率分别为93.3% vs. 24.4%(P < 0.001);CEAmRNA 阳性率分别为97.8% vs. 84.4%(P = 0.058);CK20mRNA 阳性率HIPEC前、后均为95.6%(P = 1.000)。 分别有32.5% 和30.0% 的患者HIPEC 后CEAmRNA 表达量、CK20mRNA 表达量较HIPEC 前显著下降(均P < 0.001)。 HIPEC 前、后CEA 、CA125、CA19- 9 阳性率分别为50.0% vs. 23.6%(P = 0.016)、52.6% vs. 47.4%(P = 0.409)、36.8% vs.26.3%(P = 0.121)。结论:HIPEC 可有效杀灭腹腔游离癌细胞,为实现腹膜癌的细胞学根治提供了一个可行的方法。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To assess the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treating intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) and the feasibility of the cytological cure for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Methods:Peritoneal lavage liq-uid (or ascites) from 45patients with PC were collected before and after intraoperative HIPEC to detect CEA mRNA and CK 20mRNA by peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) test and simple or real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The blood samples before and after HIPEC were also collected to detect serum tumor markers, including CEA, CA125, and CA 19- 9. Results:The positive rates of PLC and the RT-PCR of CEA and CK20mRNAs before and after HIPEC were93.3% (42/45) and 24.4% (11 /45) ( P< 0.001), 97.8% (44/45) and 84.4% (38/45) (P=0.058), and 95.6% (43/45) and 95.6% (43/45) (P=1.000), respectively. After HIPEC, 32.5% and30.0% of the patients showed a significant decrease in CEA and CK20mRNA levels, respectively (P<0.001 for both). More-over, the positive rate of serum CEA, CA125, and CA 19- 9 before and after HIPEC were 50% vs.23.6% (P=0.016), 52.6% vs.47.4% (P=0.409), and 36.8% vs.26.3% (P=0.121), respectively. Conclusion:HIPEC could effectively eradicate IFCCs and provide a feasible approach to achieve cytological cure for PC.

     

/

返回文章
返回