Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy between chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and chemotherapy plus G-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and hematopoietic recovery after transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
Methods A retrospective study of autologous PBSC (APBSC) mobilization data of 56 MM patients who were treated with chemotherapy plus G-CSF or chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF from May 2008 to July 2016 in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital was conducted. The mobilization efficacy and hematopoietic recovery were analyzed.
Results In the univariate analysis, the successful collection rate of a single harvest in women and in patients with ISS stage Ⅲ and R-ISS stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ and treated with chemotherapy plus G-CSF was lower (P < 0.05). However, age (≤ 60 years vs. > 60 years), subtype, D-S staging (Ⅰ+Ⅱ vs. Ⅲ), number of cycles of chemotherapy before mobilization (≤ 6 cycles vs. > 6 cycles), disease phase before mobilization (PR vs. CR), and interval between diagnosis and mobilization (≤ 18 months vs. > 18 months) were not correlated with CD34+ cell collection and successful mobilization rates (P > 0.05). In the multivariate model, the successful mobilization rate in patients who received the chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF mobilization regimen was higher (OR=12.009, 95% CI=1.961-73.537). The effect of mobilization regimens remained significant (P=0.007). Hematopoietic recovery without transplantation-related mortality occurred successfully in all patients.
Conclusions Chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF mobilization regimens can significantly increase the effect of APBSC mobilization and ensure the recovery of hematopoietic function after transplantation. Chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF mobilization regimens are safe and effective for mobilizing APBSCs.